Purdue’s Richard Sackler Allegedly Called Opioid Addicts ‘Victimizers’
(Bloomberg) -- The former chairman of OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma LP blamed victims of opioid abuse for their own suffering in emails from 2001 that predicted a liberal backlash if his views were made public, according to a court filing.
“Abusers aren't victims; they are the victimizers,” Richard Sackler said in an email to an unidentified friend, according to previously undisclosed messages added to a lawsuit by Connecticut Attorney General William Tong.
Excerpts of the exchange were included in an amended, unredacted complaint filed Monday against the company and the billionaire Sackler family, which owns Stamford, Connecticut-based Purdue.
The attorneys general from New York and Massachusetts have filed similar complaints accusing Purdue and the Sacklers of triggering an epidemic of opioid abuse with excessive marketing of the highly addictive OxyContin painkiller. The cases have created a potentially massive legal liability that has led Purdue to say it might file for bankruptcy protection.
Read More: Purdue Pharma Settles Oklahoma Opioid Suit for $270 Million
Complaints against the company allege that even small amounts of OxyContin can trigger addiction and that Purdue sought to increase sales by convincing doctors to prescribe higher and higher doses, even for minor pain.
“These emails are far more than a momentary lapse in judgment between friends,” Tong, a Democrat who took office in January, said Tuesday in a statement. “They encapsulate the depraved indifference to human suffering that infected Purdue's entire business model.”
“The insensitive language in emails doesn't reflect what Dr. Sackler or Purdue actually did about the emerging problem of opioid abuse,” Sackler's lawyer, David Bernick, said in a statement. “These emails were written two decades ago following news reports about criminal activity involving prescription opioids, such as drug store robberies.”
Bernick said Sacker had apologized for the emails. At a deposition in March, the former chairman said he'd been “quite emotional” when he wrote them, according to a transcript.
Evolving Views
“I've gotten a lot more information about addiction in general and opiate -- or opioid addiction in particular, and of course, my views have evolved and changed,” Sackler said in the deposition.
Purdue and the Sacklers have repeatedly denied wrongdoing and called such lawsuits misguided attempts to place blame for a national crisis.
According to Tong's complaint, Sackler's comment about addicts being victimizers was made in response to his acquaintance's claim that opioid abusers made the choice to die.
“Abusers die, well that is the choice they made, I doubt a single one didn't know of the risks,” the acquaintance wrote. If people die because they abuse OxyContin, “then good riddance.”
Big Payments
“Unfortunately, when I'm ambushed by 60 Minutes, I can't easily get this concept across,” Sackler said in response, according to the complaint. “Calling drug addicts ‘scum of the earth' will guarantee that I become the poster child for liberals.”
Tong says a bankruptcy filing by Purdue wouldn't be due solely to legal liabilities but also would reflect large payments to Sackler family members over many years.
In 2010, he says, the company developed a decade-long plan to increase opioid sales in which the Sackler family stood to receive hundreds of millions of dollars a year through 2020. The payments were made despite the knowledge that Purdue “faced certain and significant liabilities” from the litigation, according to the complaint.
The lawsuit seeks to recover money transferred to the Sacklers and unspecified damages for the cost of dealing with the opioid crisis. “At board meeting after board meeting, the Sacklers voted to have Purdue pay them hundreds of millions in Purdue profits from the sale of opioids” through entities controlled by Sackler-linked trusts, the complaint says.
The case is State of Connecticut v. Purdue Pharma LP, X07 HHD-CV-19-6105325-S, Connecticut Superior Court (Hartford).
To contact the reporters on this story: Erik Larson in New York at elarson4@bloomberg.net;Jef Feeley in Wilmington, Delaware at jfeeley@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: David Glovin at dglovin@bloomberg.net, Peter Jeffrey
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.