Plan To Merge Viacom, CBS Called Off
A plan to re-merge media-entertainment giants Viacom and CBS a decade after their breakup was called off Monday by the controlling Redstone family.
"Over the past few months, after careful assessment and meetings with the leadership of both companies, we have concluded that this is not the right time to merge the companies," said a statement from tycoon Sumner Redstone and his daughter Shari Redstone.
The plan announced in September had been seen as a way to reshape the media-entertainment empire created by the 93-year-old Sumner Redstone, who is in failing health and whose competence has been challenged.
The Redstone family issued the statement through its holding company National Amusements, which holds a majority of voting stock in both Viacom and CBS.
Earlier this year, some analysts said a combination could be a way to compete against rising media stars in a new landscape such as Netflix, Hulu and Amazon.
One potential scenario envisioned by analysts would see CBS chairman and chief executive Les Moonves take over the combined firm.
The move was seen as a way to revive the fortunes of Viacom, which operates the Paramount studios in Hollywood and an array of cable TV channels, but which has been struggling to keep up with the changing environment.
But the Redstone family statement said they now believed the two firms should remain independent.Â
"Following the management changes that the Viacom board put in place, we have been very impressed with the forward-looking thinking and strategic plan being pursued under (acting chief executive) Bob Bakish's leadership," the statement said.
"We know Viacom has tremendous assets that are currently undervalued, and we are confident that with this new strong management team, the value of these assets can be unleashed. Â At the same time, CBS continues to perform exceptionally well under Les Moonves, and we have every reason to believe that momentum will continue on a stand-alone basis."
Â
(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.