Paytm Q4 Results: Net Loss Narrows, Revenue Grows 13%
One 97 Communications Ltd., the parent company of digital payments platform Paytm, saw its net loss narrow on the back of a double-digit rise in revenue during the quarter ended March 31.
The Vijay Shekhar Sharma-led company posted a net loss of Rs 168.40 crore during the March quarter, as against an estimate of Rs 369.20 crore. The company had posted a net loss of Rs 392 crore in the preceding December quarter.
Paytm reported a 13% rise quarter-on-quarter in revenue at Rs 2,334.50 crore during Q4, as compared with an estimated Rs 2,325.73 crore.
Paytm Q4 FY23 Key Highlights (Consolidated, QoQ)
Revenue grew 13.2% to Rs 2,334.50 crore, against an estimate of Rs 2,325.73 crore.
Ebitda loss narrowed to Rs 129.10 crore from Rs 330.70 crore. Analysts had forecasted loss of Rs 209.10 crore.
Net loss narrowed to Rs 168.40 crore as against a loss of Rs 392.10 crore, and an estimated loss of Rs 369.20 crore.
The higher revenue was driven by increase in gross merchandise value, higher merchant subscription revenue, and growth of loans distributed through the platform, Paytm said in a statement on Friday.
Paytm's gross merchandise value rose 4.6% quarter-on-quarter in the three months to March 2023 to Rs 3.62 lakh crore. Merchant subscriptions rose 17.24% to 68 lakh as compared with the preceding December quarter.
Value of loans disbursed during the period under review increased 26% sequentially in the March quarter to Rs 12,554 crore, while the number of loans grew 13% to 1.19 crore.
"During the second half of this year, we achieved operational profitability (Ebitda before Esop) and we believe we can continue our growth momentum and improve our profitability further. We have made significant investments towards sales manpower, improvement of technology platform, marketing spends, etc., which will help us carry this momentum," the company said in its statement.
One 97 Communications closed 2.75% higher at Rs 689.45 apiece on Friday, as compared with a 1.13% decline in the benchmark Sensex, which ended the day's trade at 61,054.29.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.