Shell Hands Out a Dose of Oil-Price Reality
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Hats off to the board of Royal Dutch Shell Plc for letting reality rather than hope determine the oil major's dividend. Thursday's historic and hefty cut to the payout recognizes that the pandemic is likely to change the dynamics of energy demand for some time. The hope now must be that Shell resists any pressure to reverse the reduction in a hurry. Instead, it should use the breathing space to reset more fundamentally how it allocates financial resources to investment, debt reduction and paying out to shareholders.
The 66% drop in the quarterly dividend is momentous. High dividends have made Shell, along with London-listed peer BP Plc, a favorite among income funds and retail investors — a constituency the move is bound to upset. Shell pulled every lever to maintain the payout when the oil price collapsed in 2014; investors expected more of the same this time. The stock was down as much as 8% in early trading on Thursday, having already fallen by more than a third this year.
Shell actually performed well in the first three months of 2020, partly because the impact of the pandemic and a Saudi Arabia-led price war in the oil market hit late on. Operating cash flow, stripping out some helpful working-capital effects, was $7.4 billion, compared with $12 billion in the fourth quarter. Divestment proceeds helped fund capital expenditure, so the company's net investment needs used up only $2.7 billion of cash. That meant the existing $3.5 dividend bill looked affordable. Shell even cut net debt both absolutely and as a proportion of its total capital, a keenly watched leverage measure known as gearing.
But it would have been foolish to extrapolate from the first quarter. Cash generation this year remains difficult to predict. Asset disposals will be harder to do. The company is taking similar action to BP by cutting capital spending and operating costs, but this can only go so far. The difference is that Shell, unlike BP, is unwilling to maintain the dividend by letting debt rise and crossing its fingers for a recovery.
Indeed, Shell is still saying it would like its gearing to be below 25%. The measure was 29% at the end of March, against 36% at BP. With the dividend now costing only about $1.2 billion per quarter, the company is at least trying to live within its means and fund the payout from operations without relying on asset sales or borrowing.
What if the economy picks up next year? The pressure will be on Shell to revert to being the high-dividend stock it once was.
But there's a chance now to change the Anglo-Dutch oil giant into a permanently less indebted company, making more use of share buybacks to return excess cash to investors. That might be rewarded by the stock trading on a higher multiple of earnings, if the historic relative valuation of the less highly geared U.S. oil majors is anything to go by. Shell would also have more resources to invest in the energy transition, ideally accelerating its existing plan to become a net-zero emitter by 2050.
Investors are upset today, but Shell's dividends have always been discretionary — like those of its peers. If that discretion isn't used now, it never will be.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Chris Hughes is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering deals. He previously worked for Reuters Breakingviews, as well as the Financial Times and the Independent newspaper.
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.