Obama-Era Net Neutrality Rules End June 11 as Challenges Proceed
(Bloomberg) -- The Federal Communications Commission's Obama-era requirement that internet service providers treat web content equally will end June 11 and be replaced by new rules compelling them to disclose their practices.
“On June 11, we will have a framework in place that encourages innovation and investment in our nation's networks,” FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, a Republican, said in an emailed statement, announcing the changeover. “And we will embrace a modern, forward-looking approach that will help the United States lead the world in 5G, the next generation of wireless connectivity.”
The White House has completed review of the revision passed in December by the Republican-led FCC, according to notice in federal register. During the review, the regulation approved by the panel when Barack Obama was president -- which forbids internet service providers from barring or slowing web traffic -- has remained in effect.
Democratic FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel lamented the change.
“The FCC is on the wrong side of history, the wrong side of the law, and the wrong side of the American people,” Rosenworcel said in an emailed statement. “It deserves to have its handiwork revisited, reexamined, and ultimately reversed.”
The new rules are under challenge in the courts and by Congress.
Senate Democrats have vowed to force a vote, which could take place next week, to nullify the FCC gutting of old net neutrality rule. They're using a mechanism that lets Congress override agency actions, and say they have 50 votes, including one from a Republican. That may be enough for passage. The measure isn't likely to win a majority in the House, where Republicans hold a larger majority, or, if it did, be signed by President Donald Trump.
To contact the reporter on this story: Todd Shields in Washington at tshields3@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Jon Morgan at jmorgan97@bloomberg.net, Elizabeth Wasserman
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.