NYC’s Amazon Negotiator Laments What Might Have Been
(Bloomberg) -- Amazon.com Inc. was chased out of New York by politicians and media coverage that inaccurately described the government incentives underlying the deal, according to a city official who played a key role in forging the agreement that fell apart last week.
James Patchett, president of the city's Economic Development Corp., made clear that he was still smarting from the deal's collapse while speaking to business executives Thursday at a Crain's Magazine breakfast forum.
He laughingly agreed with an interviewer's observation that his speaking invitation “was supposed to have been a coronation but instead was more like a coronary.” Yet, he said the deal showed New York's value to potential employers, with its skilled workforce that includes 2.3 million college graduates.
“I remain incredibly proud of the work we all did together,” Patchett said. “I was not surprised that New York was chosen.”
The deal fell apart, Patchett said, because Amazon wasn't prepared to respond to questions about how it would operate in the city. “This is New York, after all, where the only thing we can agree on is that it's hard to be a Knicks fan,” he said.
In November, Amazon chose Long Island City, just across the East River from Manhattan, and Arlington, Virginia, over 200 other competing locations for two satellite headquarters in an expansion to its home in Seattle. The deal, reached after a year's search, held out the promise of 25,000 to 40,000 new jobs for New York, and in return the city and state offered as much as $3 billion in tax breaks and grants.
“Anyone familiar with the facts knows there was no $3 billion,” Patchett said. That number, he said, was a projection of how much local tax money the company might not have to pay, including more than $1 billion in discretionary state grants, if it fulfilled its promise to create 25,000 jobs over 10 years. “The dialogue was poisoned by this misinformation,” he added.
“How do we cut through this misinformation and confusion and create a path forward?” Patchett said. “For our future to be successful we have no option but to continue building our tech sector; if we don't keep going all in, one of our competitors will.”
The city and state would have reaped as much as $27.5 billion in revenue from the deal, according to Governor Andrew Cuomo. Yet opponents in the City Council and state Senate objected to a deal that was hashed out in secrecy and used tax dollars to lure a company worth almost $800 billion and run by Jeff Bezos, the world's wealthiest individual.
The company's hostile stance toward unionization provoked more opposition in a city where organized labor retains political clout. And it didn't help that in congested New York, with crowded, underfunded and crumbling subways, Amazon would get its own heliport so executives could fly in over the traffic.
The unraveling of the deal gathered momentum with the Feb. 4 appointment of state Senator Michael Gianaris, a fierce critic of the deal, to a state board that gave each member veto power over it. Even though Cuomo could have rejected him, he took no action. A Feb. 8 report that Amazon was reconsidering its move further emboldened its opponents, including a City Council majority and U.S. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Amazon withdrew on Feb. 15.
“There's no question that the company was not prepared for what happened in New York City,” Patchett said. “They were not prepared frankly in the way they reacted. They didn't perform well in the public City Council hearings. They didn't hire local consultants. I think you have to recognize what New York is like. People who are successful here succeed in that environment. ”
In the end, Patchett said, “what it came down to is that not enough people could see themselves in those jobs. People were not as passionately positive about it because they couldn't see themselves in those jobs.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Henry Goldman in New York at hgoldman@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Flynn McRoberts at fmcroberts1@bloomberg.net, Stacie Sherman, Robin Ajello
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.