Trump Was Right to Walk Away From Kim
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Arms-control enthusiasts must be disappointed. On Thursday afternoon, President Donald Trump cut short his summit in Hanoi with North Korea's Kim Jong Un. “Sometimes you have to walk,” Trump explained later at a press conference.
He's right. Trump said Kim demanded a full lifting of sanctions in exchange for only partial denuclearization. It's an old tactic for the North Koreans. They negotiate, pocket concessions, then fail to deliver.
Unfortunately, the president is wrong about another point he made at the press conference: the prospects for a deal with Kim. As Trump tells it, Kim would like for his gulag state to be prosperous like Vietnam — another former U.S. foe with a penchant for Marxism. “I've been telling everybody, they have tremendous potential,” Trump said, referring to North Korea.
They don't. It's hard to know what's going on inside Kim's head, but if he has an ounce of common sense he must know that he cannot both oversee a healthy market economy and remain the warden of a prison state.
This is not to say that authoritarian states cannot become wealthier; China and Russia show otherwise. But the North Korean state is a combination of Josef Stalin's Soviet Union and George Orwell's “1984.” Start with the fact that slavery remains a key part of its economy. Matthew Zweig, an analyst for the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, estimates that one in 10 North Korean workers are slaves, pressed into labor in camps visible in satellite photos.
There are also approximately 100,000 North Koreans sent abroad to work mainly as manual laborers, whose earnings are taxed at near confiscatory rates. (Much of this is detailed in a lawsuit filed by a North Korean ship worker who worked 12-hour days at a shipyard in Poland in unsafe conditions with almost all of his wages paid in taxes to Pyongyang.) It's a scheme that provides Kim's regime with the hard currency it needs to build nuclear weapons and the missiles to deliver them.
It should go without saying that this system will never yield the kind of healthy economy that Trump dreams of for North Korea. For North Korea to be prosperous, its citizens cannot live in perpetual terror and fear. The problem for Kim is that, without fear, his regime would crumble.
For now, then, it doesn't look like an economic revolution is on the horizon. Trump's instinct to try to negotiate a deal to at least defang this menace is not crazy. But his offer to make North Korea prosperous is foolish.
As he continues to deal with North Korea, Trump would do well to study Ronald Reagan's presidency. Like Trump, Reagan sought a deal with a dictator. But Reagan's legacy is not the arms-control agreement he made with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. It is the moral clarity Reagan brought to America's relationship with the country he called an evil empire — a vision that helped to hasten its collapse.
It's a model Trump seems to be following in Venezuela, where he has a chance to help the Venezuelan people usher out Nicolas Maduro, the Western Hemisphere's second-worst tyrant. Trump decided not to sign an agreement with Kim because “we just felt it wasn't appropriate, and we really want to do it right,” he said just before leaving Hanoi. If the president is looking for a foreign policy legacy, his best chance is half a world away.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Newman at mnewman43@bloomberg.net
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Eli Lake is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering national security and foreign policy. He was the senior national security correspondent for the Daily Beast and covered national security and intelligence for the Washington Times, the New York Sun and UPI.
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.