Nike 'Sell' Rating: Competitors Are Gaining
(Bloomberg Gadfly) -- The jeers being directed at Nike are getting louder.
Analysts at Bank of America Merrill Lynch downgraded the athletic-gear maker's stock on Monday to a "sell" from "hold," citing market-share losses to Adidas AG and Under Armour Inc., which have been nipping at Nike Inc.'s heels with new products and aggressive marketing.
Recent meetings with some of Nike's largest Asian manufacturers suggest the sportswear giant's pipeline of new, innovative products has dried up, at least through 2017, the analysts wrote. And one of Nike's biggest factories, Pou Chen, has said it's looking to diversify its customers beyond Nike.Â
The rating change stands out because Wall Street rarely dings blue-chip companies like Nike with a "sell" rating. In fact, since 1997, Nike has never had more than one "sell" rating on its stock at a given time. And that happened in only 29 out of 216 months of consensus analyst ratings Bloomberg has collected.
Back in March, I argued Nike's dominance would come under attack I urged Nike to take its competition more seriously
But the sportswear giant hasn't changed its tack. Nike's sales came in lower than Wall Street expected in the latest quarter. And growth in North American futures orders -- a mechanism that lets retailers order Nike goods several months in advance of delivery -- slowed for the fourth straight quarter, a sign of dwindling demand for its products.
Futures growth in China, which had soared as Nike invested heavily in the country, also started showing signs of weakness. Together, North America and China account for about two thirds of Nike's total revenue.Â
Instead of addressing the futures shortfalls on its earnings call last month, Nike dismissed the metric's value, taking the old "lies, damned lies, and statistics" approach. In fact, Nike said it would no longer include futures growth -- which investors have long used to gauge the company's progress -- in its quarterly earnings releases.Â
Meanwhile, Nike's shares have sunk 23 percent in the past year. The last time Nike's stock fell for more than four consecutive quarters was back in 1984.Â
And for good reason. At $32 billion in annual revenue -- more than the sales of Adidas, Lululemon, Under Armour, and Foot Locker Inc. combined -- Nike is the undisputed leader in athletic apparel and footwear. But Nike has gotten too comfortable in the role, and competitors that started small (i.e. Lululemon and Under Armour) have started to aggressively steal its sales.
As the so-called athleisure trend tapers off, consumers are switching out of their running and basketball sneakers in favor of more casual styles, such as the Stan Smith and Old Skool lines of Adidas and Vans, respectively.Â
And as its cheaper rivals gain prominence, Nike is finding it harder to raise prices on its shoes, a tactic it had tried successfully in the past when it didn't have any new or exciting styles to woo shoppers. Further pressuring margins is Nike's shift to sell more of its goods online -- a smart move, but one that comes with consequences for profits.Â
Nike might not be able to do much about the profit pressures or increased competition. But it can acknowledge that sales are slipping and that it needs a plan to fix its problems, whether that's accelerating new products or moving more aggressively to sign endorsements and keep talented people from going to competitors. Otherwise, it could watch a temporary losing spell morph into an all-out upset.
-- With assistance from Tara LachapelleÂ
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.
To contact the author of this story: Shelly Banjo in New York at sbanjo@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Gongloff at mgongloff1@bloomberg.net.
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.
-
Everything, Everywhere, All At Once: Dalal Street's Week To Forget | Joining The Dots
Visa curbs, a Starlink spat and cancer drug caps: what connects this week's shocks for Indian markets
-
India Is Going Abroad For Critical Minerals. But It May Take Years To Pay Off | The Reason Why
Although India's steps are in the right direction, they remain modest compared with India's growing dependence.
-
When Everyone Has AI, What Gives You An Edge?
India's young workforce is entering an uncertain world of work where powerful AI tools are becoming widely accessible. The advantage will belong to those who combine deep expertise with digital fluency, and the distinctly human capabilities that technology cannot manufacture.
-
Wrong Labels, High Pesticide Residues Holding Back Agri Exports | The Reason Why
India needs stronger domestic food-safety and labelling standards, with best practices becoming part of everyday business for farmers, traders and food companies.