NCLT Refuses To Admit RHC Holding Into Insolvency
The National Company Law Tribunal today rejected the insolvency petition filed against RHC Holding on the grounds that insolvency code does not allow for such petitions to be filed against non-banking financial companies.
The plea, filed by HDFC Ltd. to recover Rs 41 crore, said there was a default even after they raised a demand for the pending dues. RHC Holding is promoted by Singh Brothers—Malvinder Mohan Singh and Shivinder Mohan Singh.
HDFC argued that once the default is established and the proposed insolvency resolution officer is facing no disciplinary proceedings, their petitions must be admitted and insolvency proceedings must begin.
Earlier, Daiichi Sankyo Pvt. Ltd. had filed an intervention application in the case opposing HDFC's petition. Daiichi argued that there is an ongoing legal proceeding against RHC Holding in the Delhi High Court which has passed an order of status quo on the assets of RHC Holding.
Daiichi had moved the high court seeking enforcement of its Rs 3,500 crore arbitration award.
RHC Holding argued that they are a financial service provider and do not qualify as a corporate debtor against whom insolvency proceedings can be initiated as per the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The company also produced a copy of their Memorandum of Procedure in the tribunal along with the certificate issued by the Reserve Bank of India recogninsing it as a Non Deposit Accepting Non Banking Financial Company (NDSI-NBFC).
While accepting the arguments made by RHC Holding, the tribunal dismissed the petition seeking insolvency proceedings against the company. The tribunal, however, made it clear that it is not making any claims on the merit of the controversy or the right of HDFC's claim in front of any other forum.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.