Maxwell Prosecutors Oppose Keeping New Trial Request Under Seal
(Bloomberg) -- Ghislaine Maxwell's prosecutors said her request for a new trial based on a juror's disclosure that he was the victim of childhood sexual abuse should be public.
Last month the British socialite filed the request under seal, with her lawyer Christian Everdell arguing on Tuesday that public disclosure would “provide a roadmap” for the juror and give him “an improper preview” of information he shouldn't have. Maxwell's jury was anonymous and the man was only known as “Juror 50” during the trial.
Prosecutor Maurene Comey on Friday rejected Maxwell's claims as “unfounded,” arguing there was no reason for the filings to remain sealed because the material was already made public by the juror when he spoke with the media.
“There can be no need to hide from public view a discussion of public materials,” Comey said. “The defense's suggestion that her defense briefing contains information from some significant investigation into Juror 50 is not accurate; the motion does not contain any significant material that is not otherwise public.”
Several media organizations have also urged U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan to unseal the proceedings.
Maxwell, who was convicted in December of enticing, grooming and sexually abusing underage girls with her former boyfriend Jeffrey Epstein, requested a new trial after the juror told several media outlets that his revelation of past sexual abuse helped sway other jurors to convict.
While prospective jurors were asked whether they had been victims of sexual abuse, the juror, who identified himself as Scotty David, his first and middle names, told Reuters that he “flew through” the jury questionnaire. He also said he didn't remember such a question but would have answered honestly if asked.
Prosecutors have asked the judge to question the juror, but Nathan hasn't yet ruled on the request.
The case is U.S. v. Maxwell, 20-cr-00330, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan)
©2022 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.