Markets Regulator Asks Top 100 Listed Firms To Confirm Or Deny Rumours From Oct 1
To streamline the disclosure requirements, Sebi has notified rules asking the top 100 listed companies by market capitalisation to confirm, deny or clarify any market rumour reported in the mainstream media from October 1.
Further, for the top 250 listed entities, the rule will kick in from April 1, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) said in a notification.
These companies will have to "confirm, deny or clarify any reported event or information in the mainstream media which is not general in nature and which indicates that rumours of an impending specific material event" are circulating amongst the investing public, within 24 hours from the reporting of the information.
To strengthen the corporate governance at listed entities, Sebi came out with a framework to address the issue of certain shareholders enjoying special rights perpetually.
Any special right granted to the shareholders of a listed entity will be subject to the approval of the shareholders in a general meeting by way of a special resolution once every five years starting from the date of grant of such special right.
This comes amid public institutional shareholders increasingly voicing their concerns against special rights being conferred upon the promoters, founders, and certain body corporates of those companies.
Sebi noted that shareholders' agreements are drafted in such a way that those special rights (nomination rights) would continue to be available even after significant dilution of their holding in those entities. This permits the shareholders to enjoy such special rights perpetually, which is against the principle of rights being proportional to one's holding in a company.
Also, the regulator said that all directors appointed to the board of a listed entity need to go through a periodic shareholders' approval process, thereby providing legitimacy to the director to continue to serve on the board.
This would substantially address the concerns around the grant of board permanency by listed entities to certain selected persons -- mostly promoter-directors or related persons -- by invoking the rights conferred on it by the AoA of a company or by such persons being appointed as directors deliberately making them not liable to 'retirement by rotation' and without a defined tenure.
"With effect from April 1, 2024, the continuation of a director serving on the board of directors of a listed entity shall be subject to the approval by the shareholders in a general meeting at least in once every five years from the date of their appointment or reappointment, as the case may be," Sebi said.
As on March 2024, if any director is serving on the board of a listed entity without his/her appointment being subject to shareholders' approval during the last five years, the listed entity will have to take shareholders' approval in the first general meeting to be held after March 31, 2024, for his or her continuation on the board.
Sebi said that agreements whose purpose and effect is to impact the management or control or impose any restriction or create any liability need to be disclosed to the stock exchanges. However, agreements entered by a listed entity for the business operations of a company -- supply agreements, purchase agreements, etc -- would be excluded from the scope of disclosures.
Also, the regulator issued rules to strengthen the framework of slump sales executed outside the scheme of arrangement framework to safeguard the interest of minority shareholders.
It introduced the provisions in the disclosure rules for the sale, disposal, or lease of whole or substantially the whole of the undertaking of the listed company and also mandated disclosure of the objects and commercial rationale for such sale, disposal, or lease, to the shareholders.
Sebi said that for the material events or information which emanate from the listed entity, including those related to acquisitions, Scheme of Arrangement, consolidation of shares, and buyback of securities, the timeline for disclosure by the entity has been reduced from 24 hours to 12 hours.
In case of information that emanates from a decision taken in a meeting of the board of directors, the disclosure should be made within 30 minutes from the closure of such meeting.
Listed entities have been asked to disclose fraud and defaults by directors or senior management as Sebi has specified material information for investors. Currently, such disclosure by a listed entity or its key managerial personnel or promoter, and arrest of key managerial personnel or promoter are mandated.
In addition, listed entities have been asked to disclose default in payment of fines, penalties, and dues to any regulatory, statutory, enforcement, or judicial authority.
Also, the regulator asked listed entities to make disclosures in relation to cybersecurity incidents, cybersecurity breaches, or loss of data and documents in the quarterly corporate governance report.
With regard to vacancies of certain key managerial posts, Sebi said that any vacancy in the office of Chief Executive Officer, Managing Director, and Whole Time Director needs to be filled within three months from the date of such vacancy.
Listed entities will have to submit a certificate to the bourses regarding the status of payment of interest, dividend, repayment, and redemption of principal of non-convertible securities, within one working day of it becoming due.
To give these effect, Sebi has amended LODR (Listing of Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) rules, which would come into force from July 14.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.
-
Everything, Everywhere, All At Once: Dalal Street's Week To Forget | Joining The Dots
Visa curbs, a Starlink spat and cancer drug caps: what connects this week's shocks for Indian markets
-
India Is Going Abroad For Critical Minerals. But It May Take Years To Pay Off | The Reason Why
Although India's steps are in the right direction, they remain modest compared with India's growing dependence.
-
When Everyone Has AI, What Gives You An Edge?
India's young workforce is entering an uncertain world of work where powerful AI tools are becoming widely accessible. The advantage will belong to those who combine deep expertise with digital fluency, and the distinctly human capabilities that technology cannot manufacture.
-
Wrong Labels, High Pesticide Residues Holding Back Agri Exports | The Reason Why
India needs stronger domestic food-safety and labelling standards, with best practices becoming part of everyday business for farmers, traders and food companies.