LA Offers $3 Billion to House 60% of Homeless to Settle Case
(Bloomberg) -- Los Angeles agreed to spend as much as $3 billion over five years on a program to house about 60% of the homeless in the city, ending a lawsuit that claimed it wasn't doing enough to deal with the unfolding crisis.
“This settlement seals our commitment to finding solutions for our unhoused neighbors, holds us accountable to make the necessary investments, and will help us to build a future where no one has to suffer on our streets,” Mayor Eric Garcetti said in a statement on Friday. The lawsuit was filed by the LA Alliance for Human Rights, a group of downtown residents, homeless individuals and small business owners.
The settlement follows a federal appeals court's reversal last year of a judge's sweeping order that required the city and county of Los Angeles to quickly shelter all homeless people living on downtown's Skid Row, where tents and cardboard shelters line the sidewalks. The appeals court in San Francisco said U.S. District Judge David O. Carter “impermissibly resorted to independent research” to form his opinion.
Read More: LA Mayor Blames ‘Housing, Housing and Housing' for Exodus
Carter last year toured and held hearings in Skid Row before issuing his order. Carter, Los Angeles City Council and Garcetti must still approve the settlement.
Under the agreement, the city will create at least 14,000 housing units, which may include shelters and homes. The exact number will depend on the 2022 count of the homeless, which is set to be released later this year. In 2020, more than 66,000 individuals in the county of 10 million people were unhoused, a 13% increase over the previous year, the appeals court noted in its ruling.
Homelessness has been increasing even after voters in 2016 approved a $1.2 billion bond to build 10,000 supportive housing units. The program has been beset by slow progress and soaring costs, with the average price per unit running at almost $600,000, according to findings by the city controller.
©2022 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.