Jack Ma Cedes Alibaba Licenses. Investors Won’t Get Control
(Bloomberg) -- Jack Ma is quietly giving up control over the legal entities that control Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. in a move aimed at reassuring shareholders of their rights in China's most valuable company. It's also a reminder of weaknesses in corporate governance at the country's biggest companies.
Ma, who said he plans to retire from Alibaba next year, is surrendering control over the variable-interest entities, or VIEs, that hold the company's business licenses. Those licenses will be distributed among the company's top executives, spreading authority more broadly and decreasing the risks that one or two people would have undue influence over the business.
“We are in the process of enhancing the structure we use to hold our variable interest entities so that we can better ensure the stability and proper governance,” the company said in a July securities filing, adding that it plans to complete most of the changes in 2019.
But the Ma episode is a stark example of how China's rules leave shareholders vulnerable in an escalating trade war. Businesses such as Alibaba and rival JD.com Inc. that operate in sensitive industries like the internet use VIE structures to evade restrictions on foreign ownership when they go public overseas. Ant Financial, Alibaba's fast-growing finance affiliate that Ma controls, is likely to use VIEs as it goes public in Hong Kong, unless it gets a waiver or benefits from new policies from Beijing.
The entire framework rests on shaky legal ground. Beijing has never officially endorsed VIEs; they were pioneered by Sina Corp. and its investment bankers with its initial public offering in 2000. Shareholders may have difficulty enforcing rights in China should there be breaches of faith.
“VIE contracts are only enforceable as long as Beijing desires them to be so,” said Brock Silvers, managing director of Kaiyuan Capital. "Alibaba's new structure doesn't alter the risk of a controlling entity's misbehavior toward offshore investors.”
QuickTake: China's Overseas IPOs
One example of VIE risk came in 2011 when Yahoo! Inc., which owned more than 40 percent of Alibaba at the time, disclosed the Chinese company had transferred its online payments business to a separate company controlled by Ma without board permission. Yahoo shares tumbled. The dispute was settled later the same year.
“VIEs are rife with abuse,” says Carson Block, a short-seller who has criticized several Chinese companies. “You have effective impunity.”
The vulnerability of VIEs has drawn additional attention now because of the increasingly contentious trade war between the world's two largest economies. Shareholders in Chinese companies that trade in the U.S. -- from Alibaba and JD to New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. and live-streaming service YY Inc. -- don't own stock directly in those businesses, but rather in a shell company, often in the Cayman Islands.
“Compared with direct ownership, the VIE structure has some inherent limitations,” said Jeff Zhang, a partner at law firm Orrick. “It was a compromise balancing between legal restrictions and economic interest.”
Shares in many such companies have slid this year along with the rising trade tensions. Alibaba's stock is off 23 percent since its June high, slicing its market value by more than $120 billion. Ma's decision to give up the VIE licenses shows no signs of reversing that.
To contact the reporter on this story: Lulu Yilun Chen in Hong Kong at ychen447@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Peter Elstrom at pelstrom@bloomberg.net, Edwin Chan
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.