J&J Is Willing to Pay $400 Million-Plus in Hip-Device Cases
(Bloomberg) -- Johnson & Johnson is willing to pay more than $400 million to settle some of the thousands of consumers' allegations that the company sold defective artificial hips and hid the health risks of the devices, people familiar with the negotiations said.
The world's largest health-care products maker has settled, or is in the process of settling, about 3,300 of 10,000 lawsuits targeting its Pinnacle line of hip-replacement devices, a judge said in a Dec. 9 court filing.
J&J officials have agreed to pay an average of about $125,000 per case to resolve about a third of the suits pending against the company over Pinnacle hips, five people familiar with the settlement said. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to speak publicly about the deals.
An average payout of $125,000 for 3,300 cases would cost the company about $413 million.
J&J is seeking to resolve the remaining Pinnacle cases before a trial gets underway in January, the people added. Talks are continuing with lawyers for the residual hip recipients who have sued, they said.
The accords are the first settlements in the bitter seven-year litigation battle over the metal-on-metal hip implants, which some consumers say failed prematurely or gave them metal poisoning. J&J's DePuy unit made the hips, which were taken off the market in 2013.
Mindy Tinsley, a spokeswoman for J&J's DePuy unit, declined to comment on the settlements.
The settlements come as J&J is set to face a Jan. 14 trial in Dallas, where five Pinnacle-hip recipients will press claims the companies rushed the devices to market with little testing and misled doctors about the devices' safety profiles. J&J has denied those claims and said it developed and marketed the hips responsibly.
Over the past two years, juries in federal court in Dallas have ordered the company to pay at least $1.7 billion in damages over claims related to faulty hips. Several verdicts have been thrown out on appeal or reduced by trial judges, including a $1 billion award to six hip recipients that was slashed almost in half.
The U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, based in New Orleans, is weighing whether to uphold the verdict that produced the $1 billion award. The company may be motivated to settle to avoid the risk of losing the appeal, said Elizabeth Burch, a University of Georgia professor who teaches about mass-tort cases. “The value of these cases goes up if a verdict is upheld,” she said.
Rather than seeking one global settlement of Pinnacle claims, J&J is settling separate groups of cases handled by individual lawyers, U.S. District Judge Ed Kinkeade in Dallas said in a court filing. The company is using the same tactic to resolve lawsuits over its vaginal mesh inserts.
Under terms of the settlements, plaintiffs' lawyers will get a lump sum to distribute to their clients. Consumers who had the Pinnacle devices surgically removed would receive more than others who'd had minor adjustments made to the inserts, the people said.
The Pinnacle suits were consolidated before Kinkeade in 2011 for pre-trial information exchanges and test trials. J&J won the first case over the devices and then lost the next two, one of which featured the $1 billion verdict.
The case is In Re DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, 11-md-2244, U.S District Court, Northern District of Texas (Dallas).
To contact the reporter on this story: Jef Feeley in Wilmington, Delaware at jfeeley@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: David Glovin at dglovin@bloomberg.net, ;Tina Davis at tinadavis@bloomberg.net, Steve Stroth, Drew Armstrong
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.
-
Joining The Dots | Dark Skies, Steady Diya: Why Hope Holds This Diwali
With war, a weak rupee and foreign outflows weighing on sentiment, policymakers at the NDTV World Summit and market veterans at NDTV Profit Ignite: Diwali Edition offered the same advice: stay invested and filter out the noise.
-
The Curious Case of Equitas Small Finance Bank And A CEO Who Quit For Stock
PN Vasudevan believes persistent investor concerns over a perceived conflict of interest had become a governance overhang on Equitas Small Finance Bank's stock, even as the lender improved profitability and asset quality.