Olympics President 'Very Disturbed' Watching Teenage Russian Skater Compete
(Bloomberg) -- International Olympic Committee President Thomas Bach said he was “very very disturbed” watching Russian Olympic Committee figure skater Kamila Valieva's competition Thursday, adding that he felt discomfort over how the teenager, who is under investigation for a positive drug test, was treated by her coaches and support staff.
“You could feel this immense stress, maybe she would've preferred to leave the ice,” Bach told reporters Friday in Beijing. “When I afterwards saw how she was received by her closest entourage, with what appeared to be a tremendous coldness, it was chilling to see this rather than to give her comfort and try to help her.”
Valieva has been at the center of a doping controversy at the Beijing Winter Olympics after it came to light last week that she failed a drug test in December and had been briefly suspended by Russian anti-doping authorities. The 15-year-old was favored to take gold at the women's figure skating event, but in a shocking twist fell several times during the free skate portion of the contest despite commanding a large lead after the short program, and took fourth place. Her teammates Anna Shcherbakova and Alexandra Trusova took first and second, while Japan's Kaori Sakamoto placed third.
The Court of Arbitration for Sport earlier in the week ruled that Valieva would be allowed to continue competing despite the drug test, although the IOC has said there is still no verdict on whether she is guilty of doping. The World Anti-Doping Agency said it would further investigate Valieva's support staff. The ruling sparked a global outcry among both sports bodies and athletes who argued that the ruling was unfair to other competitors.
Bach also told reporters Thursday that the rules around fairness in sport and minors in senior competition would need to be reviewed, but that it would need to be done in careful consultation with other international sports bodies.
©2022 Bloomberg L.P.
With assistance from Bloomberg
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.