Insurrection? Sedition? Incitement? A D.C. Riot Guide
(Bloomberg) -- More than 700 people have been criminally charged in connection with the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 by a mob of then-President Donald Trump's supporters. Most are accused of conventional offenses such as trespassing and assault, while almost a dozen members of a right-wing group are facing a more exotic charge: seditious conspiracy. Just before he left office, Trump was impeached by the House of Representatives for incitement of insurrection but was acquitted of the charge by the Senate. The legal terminology around the unprecedented events that shocked Americans and the rest of the world requires some unpacking.
1. What is insurrection?
The term broadly means a revolt against an established government, usually employing violence. However, the federal statute against it -- which is rooted in the American Civil War of the 1860s and provides up to 10 years' imprisonment for inciting, assisting or engaging in insurrection -- doesn't define the term, so the parameters of the law are unclear. It's been prosecuted rarely.
2. What is seditious conspiracy?
It's the name given in federal law to the crime of sedition, which generally means the organized encouragement of rebellion or civil disorder against the authority of the state. In this case, the statute, also a reaction to the Civil War, spells out acts that constitute violations; that is, two or more people conspiring to overthrow the U.S. government or to forcibly oppose its authority, interfere with the execution of any law, or seize any property of the U.S. The crime carries a maximum prison term of 20 years. Seditious conspiracy and insurrection are different from treason, which is aiding the enemies of one's country. The government has filed only a handful of sedition cases in the last 80 years and not all have been successful; at least one failed because a judge dismissed the charges and another was rejected by a jury. Critics say the danger of such cases is that they may criminalize legitimate dissent.
3. What charges are rioters facing?
The Justice Department has charged more than 725 individuals for storming the Capitol, where lawmakers were counting electoral votes from the November 2020 presidential race to certify Joe Biden as the winner. The crowd overran the Capitol police, injured an estimated 140 officers, and temporarily halted the vote count.
- More than 150 rioters have pleaded guilty to a range of misdemeanor and felony charges, from unlawful entry into the Capitol building and disorderly conduct to assaulting police and obstruction of an official proceeding. Among those who've already been sentenced, Jacob Chansley -- the self-proclaimed “QAnon Shaman” who wore a coyote-skin headdress into the Senate chamber while carrying an American flag -- was ordered to serve 41 months in prison after pleading guilty to obstructing an official proceeding. Chansley vowed to appeal the sentence.
- Last January, three members of the far-right group Oath Keepers became the first to be charged with conspiring to forcibly storm the Capitol in order to prevent ratification of the election results. About three dozen more people have since been charged with conspiring to obstruct a congressional proceeding, obstruct law enforcement or injure officers, or some combination of those.
- This January, 11 leaders of the Oath Keepers were charged with seditious conspiracy, the most serious charges yet filed. The U.S. alleges that Oath Keepers founder Elmer Stewart Rhodes and 10 others coordinated travel to Washington and organized into teams as they mused about an inevitable civil war and the need for a violent assault. A trial in Washington is set for July.
4. What would prosecutors have to prove in the sedition cases?
Intent is important. It's not enough for prosecutors to demonstrate that the Oath Keepers advocated violence. Investigators have to show evidence of a deliberate conspiracy to use force to prevent the certification of Biden's election. The indictment announced Jan. 13 describes how the Oath Keepers allegedly set up staging areas for equipment in Washington's suburbs and organized training sessions to teach paramilitary combat tactics. The charging document also includes details of extensive electronic communications between the alleged co-conspirators and others before the assault, as well as excerpts of some of their encrypted messages during the riot. Rhodes, referring to Biden as a “usurper,” at one point said there would be a “bloody and desperate fight,” according to the filing. Rhodes has publicly stated that he wasn't present at the Capitol during the riot and that Oath Keepers who made trouble went rogue.
5. What is incitement?
Legally, incitement is the act of urging others to commit a crime. The article of impeachment against Trump adopted by the House cited his comments before a crowd of supporters Jan. 6, when he urged them to march to the Capitol while saying, fallaciously, that he had won the presidential election and that “if you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore.” At the conclusion of Trump's impeachment trial, which occurred after he'd already left office, the Senate voted 57–43 to convict him of inciting insurrection, falling 10 votes short of the two-thirds majority required by the Constitution, and Trump was therefore acquitted.
6. Could Trump face criminal charges?
Inciting an insurrection or riot is a federal crime, but the Justice Department would have to charge him separately. That's unlikely, according to Frederick Lawrence, a lecturer at the Georgetown University Law Center. Not only would prosecutors have to prove Trump intentionally whipped up his supporters, Lawrence said, but also that he intended for them to break into the Capitol, loot and cause bodily harm. A further complication is a 1969 Supreme Court precedent that shields inflammatory speech under the First Amendment unless it's aimed at “imminent” lawless behavior. Apart from what Trump said in his speech, prosecutors could take an alternative path if they uncover evidence that the former president or his advisers were involved in planning the riot. Whether such conspiracy charges are viable would depend on the nature of the plotting and how close Trump and his inner circle was to it. “It would all turn on who was in the room and what they are prepared to testify to,” Lawrence said.
7. What else is being done to hold rioters accountable?
Justice Department leaders are facing increasing pressure, especially from Democratic activists and lawmakers, to bring Jan. 6 perpetrators to justice. In remarks on the anniversary of the attack, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland said his investigation will continue “as long as it takes, and whatever it takes, for justice to be done.” The Justice Department has been using a federal grand jury to investigate the Jan. 6 attack and the events that led up to it, and it could be used to pursue charges against Trump and his allies, according to officials who asked to remain anonymous speaking about the sensitive matter. Meanwhile, a House investigation into the effort to prevent Biden from becoming president is moving into a more aggressive phase as lawmakers plan to hold public hearings and produce a report in the coming months. Onetime Trump strategist Steve Bannon faces criminal contempt charges for refusing to testify to the House committee. Trump raised the prospect that if re-elected in 2024 he might pardon people convicted for the riot.
The Reference Shelf
- A QuickTake explainer on what the Jan. 6 House investigation has done.
- The Trump impeachment article.
- A Congressional Research Service report on federal laws that relate to the Capitol riot.
- A paper in the Harvard National Security Journal on national security crimes.
©2022 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.