Hamas Zaps Some Life Into the Peace Process
(Bloomberg View) -- As U.S. President Donald Trump prepares to meet Wednesday with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, it appears the two-state solution isn't dead after all. Hamas, the militant group that rules the Gaza Strip, in a modestly surprising move has said it would accept a Palestinian state in pre-1967 borders.
The motives for the announcement, which also came with the group's distancing from the Muslim Brotherhood, are complex. But the key fact is that the statement is an early win for the Trump administration's nascent attempt a Middle East peace solution. It's a sign that Hamas, at least, is taking that potential initiative seriously. It doesn't want to be left out of whatever peace process emerges -- or blamed if it fails.
It's long been assumed that although Hamas wouldn't act as a spoiler to a deal between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, it also wouldn't give up its rejection of a two-state solution -- a powerful source of its legitimacy with skeptical Palestinians.
The announcement on Monday is most noteworthy for altering that traditional Hamas position. At a minimum, Hamas is saying that it now has more to gain from formal openness to a two-state solution than from maintaining its rejectionist stance.
What's changed? There are internal and external factors. For one thing, Hamas's grasp of power in Gaza is becoming increasingly tenuous, mostly for economic reasons. Israel has been keeping the purse strings tight, but so has the Palestinian Authority under Abbas. In particular, Abbas has been pushing Hamas to formally transfer government in Gaza to him -- a step that Hamas has so far shown little interest in taking.
Declaring openness to a two-state solution gives Hamas some leverage. It places Hamas in a position to compete with the Palestine Liberation Organization for moderates' support. And it makes it much harder for Abbas to justify marginalizing Hamas on the theory that it is a barrier to peace.
Israel under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu won't make any formal acknowledgment of the change in the Hamas position. But the announcement undercuts Netanyahu's strategy of using Hamas as an excuse to avoid a meaningful peace process.
Meanwhile, Hamas also needs support from the Persian Gulf states, especially Qatar. Here's where the Trump initiative comes into play.
The only way peace is conceivable is if Sunni Arab powers pressure the Palestinians to agree to a two-state solution while Trump pressures the Israelis in parallel. The payoff for both sides is a consolidated Sunni-Israeli-U.S. front against Iran and Syria.
The Qataris therefore have a strong interest in pushing Hamas out of the way of such a grand deal. That means shepherding Hamas through a kind of cleansing process, preparing it to be a productive participant in the peace process.
Distancing Hamas from the Muslim Brotherhood is part of the cleansing. In the aftermath of the failed Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt, the international organization is at its weakest point in several decades. Its leaders are enemies of the state in Egypt. Formal political parties affiliated with the Brotherhood still matter in Morocco and Jordan, subject to royal sanction. But everyone understands that the Brotherhood had its historical opportunity to govern -- and flubbed it.
Disassociation of Hamas from its Brotherhood-related origins may help Hamas participate in a negotiation that includes Egypt -- and therefore necessarily excludes the Muslim Brotherhood. It's symbolic, but not trivial.
The takeaway from all this is that Hamas is reacting to the expectation that Trump is going to make a try at a grand peace initiative that focuses on a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict. And it can only be seen as a promising sign that Hamas wants in.
The odds of success remain low, of course.
Trump has to be able to pressure Netanyahu credibly to accept a deal that Netanyahu's coalition won't want to take. That won't be easy, because Congress might well block Trump from punishing Netanyahu for noncompliance.
And getting to a deal that would be acceptable to mainstream Palestinians is also a formidable obstacle.
But on the Palestinian side, the Hamas moves lessen the worry that Hamas might try to block Abbas from doing a deal. To the contrary, Hamas may now be open to seeking a reconciliation with the Palestinian Authority, in which it normalizes itself and enters into the government of a new Palestinian state, maybe eventually as a majority party.
Trump may not be seeking a vote of confidence from Hamas. But he's now got it -- and it can only help his peace initiative, however quixotic that may be.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Noah Feldman is a Bloomberg View columnist. He is a professor of constitutional and international law at Harvard University and was a clerk to U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Souter. His seven books include “The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President” and “Cool War: The Future of Global Competition.”
To contact the author of this story: Noah Feldman at nfeldman7@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Stacey Shick at sshick@bloomberg.net.
For more columns from Bloomberg View, visit http://www.bloomberg.com/view.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.