Google and Apple See the Ghost of Future Taxes
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Google, Amazon, Facebook and Apple – or “GAFA,” as they're known in France – are easy to group together in the European imagination. They're big, they're American and they've tended to pay relatively little tax, thanks to legal loopholes and a business model that exists largely in the virtual world.
Frustrated governments have tried to use the courts and the hammer of EU regulators to squeeze more money out of the tech giants, but it hasn't always worked. So, rather than wait for international rules to catch up, France and a few others are embracing the tech sector equivalent of a financial transactions tax (a generic name for levies on transactions such as sales and purchases). It's a messy idea, but politically it makes the right noises.
Nothing about France's so-called “GAFA tax” will please those who favor simple and lucrative approaches to raising revenue for governments. Inspired by an EU proposal that failed to get unanimous backing from the bloc's 28 member states, Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire's proposal aims to hit companies making more than 750 million euros ($850 million) in global online revenues with what amounts to a 3 percent tax on their gross digital sales in France.
It's hard to see how this will help much, if you judge things purely on their economic usefulness. It will hit firms equally regardless of their profitability, its cost may end up being passed on to consumers, and there's a basic difficulty in tracking and policing digital revenues in an individual country.
The French idea seems to be that tech companies will submit their own figures, with the threat of penalties if they get the numbers wrong. Tax authorities will probably have to find new ways of gathering information to put a value on activity like digital commissions, ad sales and data collection. Even with a planned retroactive application date of Jan. 1, 2019, which is itself a controversial move, France estimates the tax will raise a measly 500 million euros – broadly the same amount brought in by the country's financial transactions tax in 2017. It's a digital drop in the ocean of France's approximately 80 billion euro deficit.
The tax has two big things going for it, though. The first is that public opinion supports it, which matters at a time when President Emmanuel Macron is clawing back popularity points from the Gilets Jaunes protest movement. And the second is that the lack of unity in the EU on this issue – with France, Italy, Spain, the U.K., Austria and Belgium pushing ahead with unilateral plans – might add to pressure on the holdouts. European voters are fed up of corporate tax loopholes, and want tech firms to pay. An EU assessment found a 14 percentage point gap in the tax rate between predominantly digital businesses and bricks-and-mortar ones.
The response from Google-owning Alphabet Inc., Apple Inc., Facebook Inc. and Amazon.com Inc., will be telling. There's a chance they will take the hostile approach and attack these taxes in court. Lawyers might argue that the levies are discriminatory against a specific sector and maybe even tantamount to a tariff on tech companies based abroad. This approach has worked in the past: Google won a legal challenge against a 1.1 billion-euro tax bill in France in 2017, after judges ruled its headquarters in Ireland took precedence.
But the smarter option from the American giants might be to quietly lobby in favor of a harmonized EU approach that would at least offer their investors some stability within the region. Tax changes are coming whether they like it or not, with the OECD and G20 looking at new global frameworks for digital levies. Tech firms can't keep fighting them forever.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: James Boxell at jboxell@bloomberg.net
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Brussels. He previously worked at Reuters and Forbes.
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.