Ex-Hedge Fund COO Says He Helped Hide Company’s Dire Finances
(Bloomberg) -- A former executive at the defunct hedge fund Platinum Partners said he helped his colleagues hide the company's true financial condition from investors as they increasingly sought to pull their money out of the firm before it collapsed.
Naftali Manela, Platinum's former chief operating officer and one of two ex-executives cooperating with prosecutors, told a federal jury that they masked the firm's struggle for cash by having one fund lend to another or paying back some investors before others.
“It enabled us to not tell investors the true state of play,” said Manela, who resigned from the company amid the cash crunch in January 2016 and pleaded guilty in December of that year. “There wasn't enough money to keep things going.”
Manela was on the witness stand on the fifth day of the trial of co-founder Mark Nordlicht, former senior executive David Levy and Joseph SanFilippo, who served as chief financial officer of one of the company's funds. The three are accused in Brooklyn, New York, of inflating the value of Platinum's largest holdings and using loans and new investor funds to pay off old investors, while telling regulators the firm had about $1.7 billion in assets under management.
Huge Returns
Platinum reported average annual returns of 17 percent from 2003 to 2015 under Nordlicht's guidance, earning the envy of the hedge-fund industry. It collapsed in June 2016 after co-founder Murray Huberfeld, a penny-stock financier from Brooklyn, was charged in a separate case involving municipal corruption.
Within a week of the arrest, Nordlicht told investors he was winding down the Platinum Partners Value Arbitrage fund. FBI agents then searched Platinum's offices. Nordlicht and the other executives were charged later that year.
Defense attorneys have argued that those who put money into Platinum were sophisticated investors who did their research and knew the risks, and that an FBI raid and government leaks to news media led them to pull their money and caused the collapse of the company.
In court on Tuesday, Manela told jurors that by early 2015 a significant number of investors were seeking to withdraw money, but many investments were in private equity and weren't easily liquidated. As a result, Manela said, Nordlicht would pick and choose which investors to pay, while shifting money between the firm's funds to keep them afloat.
‘Side Pocket'
“I helped move money between companies to generate some cash so as not to tell investors we were out of cash,” Manela said.
Manela said that by the summer of 2015 he had become frustrated and wanted to tell investors Platinum had run out of cash.
“It seemed to me the investors who were making the most noise -- who were complaining -- were getting paid,” Manela said.
By the end of 2015 the firm was becoming increasingly desperate for cash, Manela said, and had proposed creating a “side pocket” where it could stash illiquid investments and keep them out of the hands of investors. When investor Bernie Fuchs, who had become a part owner of the company, sought to make a redemption late in the year, Manela said, he had had enough and told Nordlicht it wasn't appropriate.
“It wasn't right for an owner to pull money out of the company while others were owed,” Manela said of Fuchs, who isn't accused of any wrongdoing. “I was pretty adamant, and I said if this redemption happened I would resign.”
While the redemption never took place, the problems continued, Manela said, and he resigned, pleaded guilty and agreed to cooperate with prosecutors. Andrew Kaplan, Platinum's former chief marketing officer, is also cooperating with the government and is expected to testify.
The case is U.S. v. Nordlicht, 16-cr-640, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn).
To contact the reporter on this story: Chris Dolmetsch in Federal Court in Manhattan at cdolmetsch@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: David Glovin at dglovin@bloomberg.net, Peter Jeffrey
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.