Europe’s Rebound Shows Draghi Got it Right
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- The European Central Bank faced a torrid start to the year, as critics said it was not providing enough stimulus to a slowing euro-zone economy.
In retrospect policy makers may have got it just right. The economy in the currency union expanded by 0.4 percent in the first quarter, beating expectations. The growth rate may not be spectacular, but is higher than in the last three months of 2018, when it came at 0.2 percent. The euro zone is not out of the woods yet, but the ECB's wait-and-see approach may have been vindicated.
For much of the first quarter, the central bank could not really make up its mind about the extent of the region's slowdown. President Mario Draghi noted how the industrial sector was clearly going through a rough patch courtesy of a range of one-off factors (including disruptions in Germany's automotive sector) and global trade tensions. The question was whether these weaknesses would impair internal demand.
The data from the first quarter show that euro-zone factories are back. Italy's emergence from a technical recession was probably the result of a rebound in manufacturing and entirely due to exports — the economy expanded 0.2 percent in the first quarter compared to the final three months of last year. In France, where the economy grew 0.3 percent, manufacturing accelerated significantly. In Spain, production bounced back strongly from a poor second half in 2018, driving a 0.7 percent increase in gross domestic product.
Meanwhile, there is no sign that the labor market is getting weaker: The region's unemployment rate fell to 7.7 percent in March from 7.8 percent in February, hitting the lowest level in more than ten years.
These improvements, alongside rising wages, will continue to help the services sector, which is more dependent on domestic spending. The vicious circle Draghi feared between external conditions and internal demand may have stopped just in time.
This allows a reassessment of the announcements the ECB made last March to stimulate the economy. These included a new round of cheap loans to the banks and the decision to delay the first hike in interest rates to at least the start of 2020.
This set of measures was probably stingier than what it might have been, and did not include some crucial details such as the price of the loans. There was also no sign that the ECB might want to revive asset purchases after ending them in December. This package now looks broadly adequate and is unlikely to need further adjustments when the governing council meets again in the coming months.
Still, the ECB should be as generous as it can be within the limits policy makers have set themselves. There are signs that inflation is coming back, as price pressures in Germany in April vastly exceeded estimates. Yet these were largely due to one-off factors, partly driven by the timing of Easter. Core inflation in the euro zone, which strips out more volatile items such as energy and food, remains well below the central bank's target of just under 2 percent.
The outlook also remains uncertain. In Italy the government, including finance minister Giovanni Tria, seized at the news that the country had resumed growth to say that this proved the “solidity” of its economy. But the prolonged weakness of internal demand, alongside a deeply uncertain fiscal outlook, are a reminder that Rome remains the sick man of the euro zone — and a cause of concern for its partners. The German economy, while much stronger than Italy's, is also a big question mark, as its manufacturing sector continues to stutter.
In exactly six months, a new president will take office at the ECB. The mild improvements in the euro-zone economy might be enough for Draghi to breathe a small sigh of relief as he comes close to his exit at the end of October. They should be in no way sufficient to calm down his successor, whoever he or she might be.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jennifer Ryan at jryan13@bloomberg.net
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Ferdinando Giugliano writes columns and editorials on European economics for Bloomberg Opinion. He is also an economics columnist for La Repubblica and was a member of the editorial board of the Financial Times.
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.