Deutsche Bank Is Still a Worry for the ECB
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- When Deutsche Bank AG and Commerzbank AG pulled their merger talks at the end of last month, there was an audible sigh of relief at the European Central Bank.
The deal was bound to raise eyebrows among the supervisors, as it would have concentrated the risk of a mega-bank in a single country, while offering few credible efficiency gains in return. And yet Germany's finance ministry was a vocal backer of the deal, hoping it would create a “national champion” to serve the interests of the country's businesses.
The ECB didn't sit back and watch idly. In March, Andrea Enria, the chair of its banking supervisory board, told the Financial Times that he did not like the idea of national champions. The two banks were aware they would have needed to raise substantially more capital to satisfy the ECB's regulatory demands and make sure they wouldn't need to go to back to the market soon after. Then there was the question of savings from the merger, with trade unions fearing that a viable business plan would have involved as many as 30,000 job losses.
Enria's supervisory board certainly appeared a lot harder on the deal than Bafin, the German finance regulator. As an agency of the country's finance ministry, the latter was always going to be torn between politics and economics. After all, this was the motivation behind the European Union's creation of a banking union: Detaching supervisory decisions from domestic politics, so there's less risk of capture in the national interest.
Yet the Deutsche-Commerzbank talks never really reached a crunch point – when the ECB would have been forced to take the politically toxic decision of whether or not to clear the deal. The two banks were themselves ultimately unpersuaded that the merger made sense, while the political landscape shifted slightly too. In an interview with Bloomberg, Chancellor Angela Merkel was non-committal on the idea. In a sense, the ECB dodged a bullet. Enria's first major decision as the euro zone's banking supercop can wait a little longer.
Still, this doesn't mean he can escape Germany's banking problems forever. Quite the opposite.
True, analysts now believe Commerzbank may well be in play for a combination with another bank. ING Groep NV of the Netherlands and Italy's UniCredit SpA are seen as potential partners. These lenders would bring an additional advantage: They would offer the first meaningful cross-border merger since the establishment of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (the system that brings together the banking regulators of EU member states). The ECB doesn't promote such mergers actively, but policymakers have often regretted that the bloc's banks don't seem interested in teaming up with neighbors. It would certainly help to spread financial risk across the monetary union, and prove that there is indeed a “banking union” in Europe.
Unfortunately, Deutsche is a different story and will continue to pose the ECB problems. The bank isn't suffering from immediate capital or liquidity shortfalls, but there are several areas of concern. These include its inability to cut expenses, high funding costs, a string of scandals, and the destiny of the investment bank. Still, there is a less grandiose alternative for Deutsche: Keep shrinking the lender until it becomes manageable again.
This is primarily the responsibility of the bank's management, starting with the CEO, Christian Sewing. But supervisors will need to exert more pressure than they've done so far, to make sure the bank doesn't keep missing its targets. Enria shouldn't let his relief about the failed merger make him forget that the Deutsche problem still needs fixing.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: James Boxell at jboxell@bloomberg.net
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Ferdinando Giugliano writes columns and editorials on European economics for Bloomberg Opinion. He is also an economics columnist for La Repubblica and was a member of the editorial board of the Financial Times.
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.