China Says U.S. Allies Face Retaliation If They Host Missiles
(Bloomberg) -- China warned that the U.S. and its Asia-Pacific allies risked countermeasures if they accepted the deployment of intermediate-range American missiles, singling out Australia, Japan and South Korea.
China's foreign ministry said in a statement late Monday that the country “will not sit idly by” in response to such threats, urging the U.S. to avoid escalating tensions. A ministry official separately said Tuesday that the trio of allies should “exercise prudence” and that the deployment of such weapons would “not serve the national security interests of these countries.”
The comments underscore the difficulty facing the Trump administration's effort to counter China's own missile capabilities in the region after formally withdrawing last week from its Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty with Russia. Any country that accepts the missiles risks diplomatic and economic retaliation from Beijing -- and all three U.S. allies mentioned count China as their largest trading partner.
Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison ruled out hosting U.S. missile bases Monday, after U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper said he was in favor or deploying American missiles in Asia within months. South Korea already suffered a trade blow from China after agreeing in 2016 to accept Lockheed Martin Corp.'s Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or Thaad, anti-missile system to defend against North Korea.
Australia Won't Consider Hosting U.S. Missiles, PM Morrison Says
“China will not just sit idly by and watch our interests being compromised,” Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said in a statement. “What's more, we will not allow any country to stir up troubles at our doorstep. We will take all necessary measures to safeguard national security interests.”
Limited Options
Fu Cong, director of the ministry's arms control department, also said the U.S. move would have a “direct negative impact on the global strategic stability,” according to the foreign ministry's transcript of a briefing with the official. He mentioned Australia, Japan and South Korea by name.
The 1987 INF treaty required the U.S. and Russia to never deploy ground-based ballistic and cruise missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 kilometers (about 300 to 3,500 miles) -- either nuclear or conventional. The Trump administration formally withdrew after complaining about violations by Russia and a desire to include China in a new accord.
While China can target several American allies and territories with intermediate missiles deployed on its own shores, the U.S.'s own options are limited to allies and the tiny territory of Guam. Hua, the foreign ministry spokeswoman, said that any U.S. deployment outside of its own borders will show “its aim will apparently be offensive.”
The Global Times, a nationalist newspaper published by China's Communist Party, said the U.S. risked “geopolitical chaos” with any deployments.
“Its impact will be much more serious than that of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense in South Korea, because intermediate-range missiles are undoubted offensive weapons,” the paper said in an editorial published Sunday. “Any country accepting U.S. deployment would be against China and Russia, directly or indirectly, and draw fire against itself.”
To contact Bloomberg News staff for this story: Dandan Li in Beijing at dli395@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Brendan Scott at bscott66@bloomberg.net, Jon Herskovitz
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
With assistance from Bloomberg
-
A New Samvat Wishlist: Inclusive Prosperity And Human Development
India has strengthened its economic foundations through infrastructure, digital access and enterprise. Its next growth chapter must deepen productivity, create better livelihoods and widen participation in prosperity.
-
Love, Sex Aur Dhokha: The Audacious Plot To Spy On Jensen Huang
A Taipei dinner, a Singapore chip buyer and a suspected Chinese asset: inside the alleged spy operation that got close to NVIDIA's Jensen Huang.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.