CCI Imposes Rs 64 Cr Fine on GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi
New Delhi: The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has slapped a penalty of Rs 64 crore on drug makers GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi for collusive bidding in supply of a meningitis vaccine to the government for Haj pilgrims.
The matter relates to supply of polysaccharide Quadrivalent Meningococcal Meningitis (QMMV) vaccines and the complaint was filed by Bio-Med Pvt Ltd, which also makes this drug. The complaint was also filed against the Health and Family Welfare Ministry.
Every year, the government invites tenders for purchase of meningitis vaccine that is required to be administered upon Haj pilgrims.
Apart from imposing penalties, the competition watchdog has directed GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi to "cease and desist" from anti-competitive practices.
A fine of Rs 60.45 crore has been slapped on GlaxoSmithKline and Rs 3.04 crore on Sanofi, CCI said.
The penalties amount to three per cent of their three-year average turnover. In this case, turnovers of the two companies for the financial years 2008, 2009 and 2010 have been taken into account.
Noting that existence of anti-competitive agreement between GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi is "clearly made out", the commission said both parties failed to establish independent business decision-making.
"Additionally, the peculiar market conditions, including, the presence of only three suppliers of the QMMV vaccines together with the tendering process initiated by the opposite party 1 make the market conducive to collusion," said the order dated June 4 and made public on Friday.
This is because the product is homogeneous, there is a fixed demand in the market and suppliers are repetitive, it added.
"They have not produced any evidence either before the DG or before the Commission to substantiate their claims. In the absence of any evidence, the Commission notes that the assertions made by opposite party 2 (GlaxoSmithKline) and opposite party 2 (Sanofi) are merely bald statements and also appear to be an afterthought to justify their illegal, collusive conduct," the order said.
CCI's investigation arm - Director General (DG) - had submitted its detailed probe report in November 2014.
It was also alleged that the government indulged in anti-competitive practice by changing the criteria for bidding to supply the particular vaccine.
The DG found that the changes in the conditions stipulated in the tenders issued by the government were brought about pursuant to the decisions taken at the ministerial level, the order said.
When contacted, a Sanofi spokesperson said the company is in the process of evaluating the CCI order.
"We strongly disagree with the CCI's findings in this case and are in consultation with our legal advisors to file an appeal against the order," it said in a statement.
Sanofi Pasteur is a global organisation which adheres to and abides by all the laws and regulations that apply in each country in which it operates (including those relating to fair competition), it added.
"We have extended our full support to the investigation process of the CCI in this case. Since this is an on-going matter, we cannot comment any further," the statement said.
However, queries sent to GlaxoSmithKline did not elicit any immediate response.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.