Buffett's Editor, 85, Leaves Day Job
In January 1954, a bright-eyed 24-year-old from Cole Camp, Missouri, walked into Fortune magazine's offices at Rockefeller Center in New York. Armed with a college journalism degree and work experience writing for a Maytag company magazine, she took an entry-level job assisting Fortune's male writers.
The young woman, Carol Loomis, navigated the magazine's "Mad Men"-like culture, on one occasion slapping a married colleague whom, she delicately recalled, "had an agenda." She proved herself as a reporter but had to battle gender stereotypes. In 1970, she fought her way into an Economic Club of New York dinner after its director said he did not want "any frivolous little Smith girls looking for a free dinner and the chance to spend an evening with 1,200 men in black tie."
After 60 years at Fortune, Loomis is retiring as one of the country's most venerated financial journalists, with a collection of work that reads like a history of modern Wall Street.
"She has an analytical mind, and she keeps learning," said Warren E. Buffett, the billionaire investor and a close friend. "We males never do that. We quit at about 15. We just think we know it all. At 85, she is interested in learning more."
In the 1960s, she wrote one of the first articles about hedge funds. She reported two cover articles on the risk of derivatives in the mid-1990s, long before those instruments contributed to the near collapse of the global economy. A 1999 piece, "Lies, Damn Lies and Managed Earnings," presaged the wave of accounting scandals a few years later. On Monday, Fortune will publish her final article before she retires, a piece about one of the world's most powerful financiers, Laurence D. Fink of BlackRock.
Loomis is perhaps best known as Buffett's Boswell. She has been Fortune's resident expert on Buffett since meeting him in 1966, and each year edits the annual shareholder letter of Buffett's company, Berkshire Hathaway - an unusual role for a financial journalist. The two speak nearly every business day and are frequent bridge partners, playing mostly over the Internet.
She will have more time now for bridge. At her age, she said, it was becoming too difficult to jump on a plane and take extended trips to write the deeply reported, lengthy magazine features that she worked on throughout her career.
"I began to realize that some of the things that a Fortune writer needs to do, just take for granted, become a little bit harder at this age," said Loomis, seated in a Fortune conference room Wednesday. "I didn't want to be a Fortune writer who was constrained in any way."
Loomis stressed that her departure had no connection to the recent spinoff of Fortune's parent company, Time Inc., from the media conglomerate Time Warner. In fact, she said she was never fond of Time Inc.'s 1989 merger with Warner Communications.
"I think it's good that we're out here on our own, don't have to send money to Time Warner, and we sent a lot of money to Time Warner," Loomis said.
When Loomis started at Fortune, she was surrounded by journalistic luminaries. The magazine's masthead included Hedley Donovan, who would go on to succeed Henry Luce as the editor-in-chief of Time Inc. William H. Whyte - author of "The Organization Man," the seminal book about corporate culture - and the famed photographer Walker Evans were also on the magazine's staff.
She soon became a luminary herself. Among her influential articles was a 1966 story about another former Fortune employee, Alfred Winslow Jones, considered the father of the hedge fund industry. For decades, readers contacted Fortune for copies of the piece to use as a blueprint for using hedging techniques to make money on both rising and falling stocks. Loomis cast something of a skeptical eye on Jones' fund, calling his record in forecasting the market "only fair."
Alan Farnham, a former Fortune writer who worked at the magazine during the 1980s and '90s, said Loomis taught him how much work went into producing great journalism. He worked for her as a researcher and remembers her arriving at the office with a suitcase of documents and poring over them for days.
"She would research something to the nth degree before any of the interviewing started," Farnham said. "It was evident by every word and deed that she was committing herself to an uninterrupted siege of work."
Fortune's editors helped Loomis' over her six-decade career - she is Time Inc.'s longest-serving employee - by allowing her a flexible schedule. In 1968, after she had her second child, her editors let her take summers off. As she hit her mid-60s, she cut her schedule to working seven months a year. And last year Andrew Serwer, Fortune's managing editor, agreed to cut back her output to three lengthy features a year.
"We wanted to keep her, and we wanted to keep her happy," Serwer said. "You should be flexible for your most important employees."
She was introduced to Buffett by her husband, John, a retired partner at First Manhattan, the New York investment manager. The couple, married 54 years, are longtime Berkshire Hathaway shareholders. They raised two children in Larchmont, New York, the Westchester County suburb where they still live.
Now that she is officially retired, Loomis said she hoped to first catch up on the lunches she missed while finishing her article on Fink and BlackRock. She also needs to find a place for the nine boxes of reporter's notes cluttering her garage. And she looks forward to playing more golf and bridge.
Loomis also plans to continue her regular conversations with Buffett and assist him with his writings. After editing the Berkshire Hathaway shareholder letter for nearly 40 years, she likes to remind Buffett that he still needs her help. She said that dangling participles and the passive voice were persistent problems.
© 2014, The New York Times News Service
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.