Trump’s Fed Tweets Don’t Faze Bond Traders Anymore
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- President Donald Trump laid out his most specific plan yet for what the Federal Reserve should do to turbocharge the U.S. economy — lower the central bank's benchmark interest rate by 1 percentage point and re-introduce quantitative easing.
Bond traders entirely ignored his Twitter comments.
In the hour after his tweet, the 10-year Treasury yield moved a fraction of a basis point. The dollar barely budged, as did stocks. Those are the kinds of trading ranges you'd expect on a summer Friday afternoon, not when the U.S. president casts blame on the Fed for preventing the economy from going up “like a rocket,” precisely when the Federal Open Market Committee is meeting in Washington.
Now, investors have largely been dismissing Trump's rhetoric for a while, and I feel reasonably confident that fading knee-jerk reactions to his tweets or off-the-cuff remarks would have been a profitable trading strategy over the years. As long as the economy is on solid ground and the S&P 500 is up, traders probably need not set alerts for @realDonaldTrump.
At the same time, Trump has made the central bank and Chairman Jerome Powell frequent targets, and his attacks intensified late last year as the stock markets tumbled. That's when his comments started to matter. “Stop with the 50 B's,” he told the Fed on Dec. 18, referring to the bank's policy of trimming its balance sheet by up to $50 billion a month. The Fed caved soon thereafter, signaling that they would end the runoff later this year, almost certainly earlier than Powell intended. It's open to interpretation just how big a role the president's demand played in the reversal.
One of the more conspicuous elements of Trump's latest criticism is how he has incorporated inflation into the mix. The U.S. has “wonderfully low inflation,” he remarked on Tuesday. “Importantly, inflation VERY LOW,” he tweeted on April 26. There has been “almost no inflation,” he said on April 14, adding that “quantitative tightening was a killer.” The Fed made a mistake in raising interest rates, he tweeted on March 29, “especially since there is very little inflation.”
This is hardly a coincidence. Fed officials sound intent on getting inflation higher, according to Bloomberg News's Craig Torres, after they consistently missed their 2 percent target since adopting it in 2012. Officials worry they may never reach it if they can't during this current period of strong growth and low unemployment. With the constant reminder of stubbornly subdued inflation, Trump may be trying to goad policy makers into easing.
It's unlikely to work. As I wrote last week, Fed officials are acutely aware that easing policy now would look like they're giving in to this one-sided criticism, rather than acting independently. That means traders are probably getting ahead of themselves in betting on a rate cut this year. Trump, of course, is trying to tip the scales in his favor by appointing political loyalists to counter Powell. That hasn't worked so well, with former pizza executive Herman Cain withdrawing from consideration for a seat on the Federal Reserve Board and economics writer Stephen Moore facing increasingly uncertain odds.
For some traders, the stakes are high for the Fed's May 1 decision. As Bloomberg News's Edward Bolingbroke noted, the two-year Treasury note futures contract has attracted an unprecedented number of wagers on its direction, with the equivalent of $800 billion riding on the outcome of the central bank's meeting. The fact that the market barely budged after the president's tweets is a clear signal that traders view it as nothing more than bluster.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Daniel Niemi at dniemi1@bloomberg.net
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Brian Chappatta is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering debt markets. He previously covered bonds for Bloomberg News. He is also a CFA charterholder.
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.