Aurelius Among Firms Pushing Neiman Marcus to Aid CDS Wagers
(Bloomberg) -- Aurelius Capital Management helped push Neiman Marcus Group Inc. to tweak its proposed debt swap in ways that could create a windfall later on for investors betting on a default, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
Neiman Marcus wants creditors to sign on to a bond exchange that would ease the retailer's immediate debt burden and end a dispute over the company's recent asset-shuffling. But Aurelius, the hedge fund led by Mark Brodsky, and Jeffrey Altman's Owl Creek Asset Management asked the retailer to include language that lists Neiman Marcus Group Ltd. LLC as a co-borrower on the proposed exchange's new debt, the people said.
The change would make the new bonds obligations of that entity as well as Neiman Marcus Group LLC, and thus widen the pool of debt tied to credit derivatives that pay off for investors if the company defaults. Aurelius and Owl Creek signed on to Neiman's proposal after the concessions were included, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing private negotiations.
Representatives for New York-based Aurelius and Dallas-based Neiman Marcus declined to comment. Representatives for Owl Creek, also based in New York, didn't immediately return messages.
Neiman's proposed debt swap is the latest in a string of examples of how the $10 trillion credit derivatives market can affect a company's debt restructuring and perhaps its survival. In recent years, traders who seek to profit from derivatives have helped get cash for struggling grocers, newspaper chains, homebuilders and even bankrupt Sears Holdings Corp. But Neiman's added language is stoking concern among other creditors, one of the people said, because derivatives holders can have an incentive to push the company into a default.
Aurelius holds positions in the company's term loan and bonds, and came to the negotiation table at the last minute with the provisions that would sweeten the deal for buyers of credit-default swaps, the people said. Neiman Marcus has about $4.8 billion of debt, and there are about $255 million of outstanding CDS wagers on the company.
But because of a quirk in the market, there are more CDS with side bets on the company's credit-worthiness than bonds tied to those derivatives, which depresses the value of the swaps. The revised terms favored by Aurelius and Owl Creek would widen the pool of bonds and potentially boost CDS payouts.
Cost Jumps
At the time the tentative deal was disclosed, the upfront cost to insure Neiman's debt against default for five years more than doubled to $3.3 million per $10 million of debt, according to data provider CMA.
Debtors are often wary of making concessions that appease holders of credit-default swaps, because those investors stand to profit from the company's demise, and Aurelius has an aggressive reputation in the restructuring world.
It most recently drove the rural phone company Windstream Holdings Inc. into bankruptcy after a federal judge sided with the hedge fund's argument that the company defaulted on its bonds by spinning off a unit and putting it out of reach of creditors. Windstream has accused Aurelius of forcing it into bankruptcy so the hedge fund could profit on a CDS position. Neiman Marcus's dispute with its bondholders revolves around concerns about the transfer of its MyTheresa unit.
But in recent years, companies including newspaper chain McClatchy Co. and homebuilder Hovnanian Enterprises Inc. have agreed to take financing from funds that also stood to profit from side-bets in the derivatives market. In Hovnanian's case, the company even agreed to trigger a default on one of its bonds.
--With assistance from Sridhar Natarajan.
To contact the reporters on this story: Katherine Doherty in New York at kdoherty23@bloomberg.net;Claire Boston in New York at cboston6@bloomberg.net;Eliza Ronalds-Hannon in New York at eronaldshann@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Rick Green at rgreen18@bloomberg.net, Dan Wilchins
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.