Trump Threat Unlikely to Derail China Financial-Industry Opening
(Bloomberg) -- China will probably stay true to its pledge to further open its financial industry to foreign companies, even as the Trump administration ratchets up the threat of a trade war.
The U.S. government is said to be considering clamping down on Chinese investments and imposing levies on a range of imports to punish Beijing for alleged theft of intellectual property. Would China retaliate by going back on its vow -- made by a trusted aide of President Xi Jinping before a global audience at Davos -- to remove foreign ownership limits on banks and allow overseas firms to take majority stakes in local securities firms?
Any such fears would be unfounded, according to bankers, economists, lawyers and researchers who've studied China.
“China does these things not because of trying to please international audiences. It does it because it thinks it'd be in the better interest of China,” said James Stent, who's spent more than a decade on the boards of two Chinese lenders. “I shouldn't think that they would change their views a great deal because of a trade spat with America.”
Read: China Big Bang Moment Opens Banks, Funds to Foreign Control
Firms from countries including in Europe, Japan, South Korea and Singapore are keen to invest in China's financial sector, according to Stent, who has also authored a book called ‘China's Banking Transformation: The Untold Story,' about lessons gleaned from inside the nation's banking system. Morgan Stanley is among U.S. banks that have indicated interest in investing more in their local securities joint ventures.
China will press ahead with its plans for more foreign investment because it offers Xi an opportunity to take on greater leadership in the region, said Paul Schulte, chairman of Hong Kong-based Schulte Research, an independent research firm that focuses on the financial industry. The opening of the sector is already “baked in the cake” given that the plan has wound its way through the State Council and many ministries, he said.
“China is marching forward with a coherent plan in the Far East and in Asia for their own agenda,” Schulte said, ruling out the prospect of retaliation. “China is not going to play that game."
Biggest Losers
Hu Yifan, chief economist for China at UBS Wealth Management, predicts China would take any retaliatory steps only after the U.S. has announced concrete actions, and those would target U.S. banks in the financial services sector, where the U.S. has a surplus. In such a case, European and Asian banks would benefit at the expense of American lenders.
“If that happens, U.S. bankers might start lobbying the Trump administration,” Hu said.
Read: China's Man in Davos Is ‘The Brain' Behind Economy's Overhaul
China chose Liu He to unveil its pledge at the World Economic Forum this January, a year in which China marks the 40th anniversary of its shift away from a closed Communist system. Liu is a Harvard-educated technocrat who's considered the chief architect of Xi's push to let the market have a bigger say in the economy.
That push will continue, said John Xu, Shanghai-based partner at Linklaters LLP. “The U.S.-China trade tensions are unlikely to affect the overall pace of reform regarding the opening of China's financial market.”
To contact Bloomberg News staff for this story: Alfred Liu in Hong Kong at aliu226@bloomberg.net, Cathy Chan in Hong Kong at kchan14@bloomberg.net, Gary Gao in Shanghai at cgao58@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Marcus Wright at mwright115@bloomberg.net, Jeanette Rodrigues
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
With assistance from Alfred Liu, Cathy Chan, Gary Gao
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.