How History May Score Trump’s Trade Tactics in Osaka
(Bloomberg) --
It's not often you can say this. But we've just witnessed a potentially historic weekend for the world economy. So it's worth thinking through how the history books might record it. Here's a first draft:
“As President Donald Trump flew to Japan at the end of June 2019 for a make-or-break trade meeting with China's leader Xi Jinping, European officials were quietly working on a blockbuster deal of their own to announce at the same Group of 20 summit in Osaka.
In the end Trump and Xi agreed to a truce and more talks, and markets initially cheered the armistice. But the two countries seemed no closer to bridging wide differences that wouldn't soon be settled.
Meanwhile, the European Union was taking advantage of the void left by the Trump-led U.S.'s retreat from its role as chief defender of western liberalism. For two decades Europe had been trying to nail down a pact with Brazil, Argentina and the two other members of Mercosur, a bloc traditionally known for its nationalist approach to industrial policy and protectionism. But hours before Trump and Xi met, the EU announced the deal was finally done.
The message was stark. European industrial giants such as Airbus and Siemens would gain an advantage over their U.S. competitors in Latin America. Argentinian and Brazilian farmers would win an edge in Europe over U.S. competitors, adding to the decline of America as an agricultural export power.
The EU-Mercosur talks had been a prime example of stalled liberalization efforts. Yet with Trump threatening the global order, officials in Brussels, Brasilia and Buenos Aires had spied an opportunity to forge the new economic alliance — just as the EU and Japan had in a deal that took effect earlier in 2019. A day after the leaders left Osaka summit, the EU signed a deal with Vietnam, a nation Trump just days earlier lambasted as ‘almost the single worst abuser of everybody.'
After Japan, Trump went to the only country where he could claim a sealed trade agreement: South Korea. There he toasted the deal as evidence he's winning. But in Washington officials were confronting a grim new reality for U.S. economic power. When Trump dialed up the heat with tariffs and threats, the rest of the world looked elsewhere for opportunities. The early results were not going in America's favor.”
Charting the Trade War
From Europe to Asia, global manufacturing took another knock at the end of the second quarter, according to reports that signaled a softening growth outlook as U.S.-China trade talks drag on.
Today's Must Reads
- China's industrial slump | An official manufacturing index stayed below the dividing line between contraction and expansion and was worse than economists forecast.
- Economists doubt truce | Financial markets have smiled on signs of warmer relations between the U.S. and China, but economists say threats of a growth-damaging escalation will linger.
- Good news for Huawei | Technology stocks were big early winners in a relief rally in Asia after the world's largest economies declared a truce in their year-long trade war.
- Japan-Korea tensions | Japan is planning to slap export restrictions on some tech items sent to South Korea, a sign of escalating tensions between the two Asian trading partners.
- Rate cuts coming? | While the positive signs from the G-20 will help investors' risk appetite, uncertainties over the dispute could cloud sentiment and worry central bankers.
Economic Analysis
- Huawei wins reprieve | Trump signaled an easing of restrictions that may help the tech sector
- Exports Down Under | Australian central bank weighs rate cuts amid tough external environment
Coming Up
- July 3: U.S. releases trade data for May, 8:30 a.m. in Washington
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Brendan Murray at brmurray@bloomberg.net, Zoe Schneeweiss
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.