Fed Banks Targeted by New Bill as Political Scrutiny Mounts
(Bloomberg) -- Democratic Senator Kamala Harris on Thursday upped the pressure on the U.S. central bank to make its leadership more diverse, introducing legislation to compel the Federal Reserve's 12 regional banks to interview at least one woman and one minority candidate when they search for a new chief.
The bill, the Diverse Leadership Act, would also require regional Fed banks to report to the Senate Banking Committee, the House Financial Services Committee and the Fed's Office of the Inspector General within 60 days of appointing a new president, providing demographic details on the pool of candidates they considered for the vacancy.
“It's long past time the Federal Reserve do more to guarantee that their heads of the table reflect those they serve,” Harris of California said in a statement.
The proposal is similar to a measure first put forward in the House of Representatives in 2016 by Ohio Democrat Joyce Beatty. In both cases, sponsors have compared the proposal to the National Football League's Rooney Rule, named after former Pittsburgh Steelers owner Dan Rooney, which requires NFL teams to interview minority candidates for head coaching and other top jobs.
‘Mainstream' Attention
Though the bill might struggle to get backing in a Congress currently controlled by Republicans, it points to the growing attention paid to the way Fed policy makers are chosen.
“Senator Harris introducing this is another indication that governance of Federal Reserve regional banks is a problem attracting more and more mainstream political attention,” said Aaron Klein, a fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington.
Harris is considered a possible 2020 U.S. presidential contender, along with two other co-sponsors of the bill: New York's Kirsten Gillibrand and New Jersey's Cory Booker.
Her attention also adds heft to the pressure that outside progressive groups are already putting on the San Francisco Fed's board of directors. The board is expected to announce soon they've begun looking for a replacement for John Williams, the bank's current president who will jump to the top job at the New York Fed in June.
‘Urgent' Need
“With the president of the Federal Reserve of San Francisco leaving next month and the search for his replacement underway, the need for this Diverse Leadership Act is urgent,” Harris said in the statement.
Activists who pushed the New York Fed to hire a woman or minority candidate were disappointed by the selection of Williams, a long-time Fed insider who is also white. Some of the same groups, along with organizations from the San Francisco district, have written directors at that bank urging them to consider candidates with “diverse experience” over “insider” candidates.
The Fed's monetary policy-making body, the Federal Open Market Committee, includes the Washington-based Board of Governors, who are appointed by the U.S. president and confirmed by the Senate, and each of the 12 regional Fed presidents. Regional presidents are selected by non-banking members on their respective boards of directors. That appointment process has attracted criticism for its lack of transparency and for producing disproportionately white men and Fed insiders.
Research by Klein at Brookings, updated to include the most recent appointments, shows that of the 137 people who have served as regional Fed presidents since 1913, just six have been women and none were Latino. Raphael Bostic became the first African-American to hold one of the posts when he was selected president of the Atlanta Fed in 2017.
To contact the reporter on this story: Christopher Condon in Washington at ccondon4@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Brendan Murray at brmurray@bloomberg.net, Alister Bull, Randall Woods
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.
-
Joining The Dots | Dark Skies, Steady Diya: Why Hope Holds This Diwali
With war, a weak rupee and foreign outflows weighing on sentiment, policymakers at the NDTV World Summit and market veterans at NDTV Profit Ignite: Diwali Edition offered the same advice: stay invested and filter out the noise.
-
The Curious Case of Equitas Small Finance Bank And A CEO Who Quit For Stock
PN Vasudevan believes persistent investor concerns over a perceived conflict of interest had become a governance overhang on Equitas Small Finance Bank's stock, even as the lender improved profitability and asset quality.
-
Talking Points This Week: AI Cash Burn, A Tiger Comeback And An India That Still Finds Its Own Path
India is not immune to higher oil or tighter global liquidity, yet its earnings base is broader, its domestic policy levers are still available.
-
Foreign Investors Own Half Of HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank. An LTCG Cut Could Matter Most Here
Foreign portfolio investors have US$115 billion parked in HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank. If the government cuts long-term capital gains tax, Jefferies says returning foreign money could land here first.
-
'Never Seen This Level Of Negativity': Sandeep Tandon Says The Next Rally May Be Closer Than You Think
Veteran investor Sandeep Tandon says foreign selling is easing, large-caps are due a comeback and mid-caps are crowded, while he turns positive on gold, power and pharma this Diwali.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.