Barr Departs Fed Panel On Supervision
Former Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr has stepped off the US central bank's internal governing Committee on Supervision and Regulation, leaving the panel without a chair.
The move leaves Fed Vice Chair Philip Jefferson and Governor Michelle Bowman as the only two members on the committee. Barr, as well as the other six governors on the Fed board, all have a final vote on whatever rule the panel puts out.
Barr resigned as vice chair for supervision last week, bypassing a potential fight with President Donald Trump over the role. He said in January “the risk of a dispute over the position could be a distraction from our mission.”
The role was established by the Dodd-Frank Act, a sweeping 2010 law passed after the financial crisis. Since Barr is staying on as a member of the Fed's Board of Governors, Trump would likely have to appoint a new vice chair for supervision from the existing pool of board members since the next vacancy isn't expected until 2026.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell told the House Financial Services Committee last month the board would continue its work on supervision, and noted the position can lead to “volatility” that was “not great for the institutions that we want to regulate.”
Read More: Powell Says Fed's Top Bank Cop Role Leads to More Volatility
Former Fed Governor Daniel Tarullo, one of the most influential on bank oversight in the central bank's history, didn't have the vice chair for supervision title but held a commanding grasp on Fed regulatory and supervisory policy. The Fed typically has a lead governor in charge of supervision and regulation.
Barr continues to serve on other Fed panels, including the Committee on Financial Stability and Committee on Payments, Clearing, and Settlement.
-
Foreign Investors Own Half Of HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank. An LTCG Cut Could Matter Most Here
Foreign portfolio investors have US$115 billion parked in HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank. If the government cuts long-term capital gains tax, Jefferies says returning foreign money could land here first.
-
'Never Seen This Level Of Negativity': Sandeep Tandon Says The Next Rally May Be Closer Than You Think
Veteran investor Sandeep Tandon says foreign selling is easing, large-caps are due a comeback and mid-caps are crowded, while he turns positive on gold, power and pharma this Diwali.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?