U.S. Hits Back at Huawei's Constitutional Challenge to Sales Ban
(Bloomberg) -- A U.S. law prohibiting federal agencies from buying Huawei Technologies Co. equipment isn't legislative punishment but serves to protect against China gaining a strategic foothold in those agencies' networks, the government said.
Justice Department lawyers on Wednesday asked a federal judge in Sherman, Texas, to throw out a lawsuit Huawei filed against the U.S. government in March. The Chinese telecom giant sued to invalidate a law Congress passed last year barring government purchases of its products.
"Congress's concern that Huawei could be used by the Chinese government to target U.S. telecommunications networks did not develop overnight," according to the government's filing. "Lawmakers and numerous executive branch officials have been raising concerns about Huawei's potential to enable Chinese cyber-activity against U.S. networks for over a decade and have been acting over that time to mitigate the threat."
The litigation in Texas involves Huawei's ability to sell equipment into the U.S. market and is separate from the U.S. government's blacklisting of Huawei, which prohibits the company from buying components from American suppliers.
President Donald Trump on Saturday announced that U.S. companies will be allowed to sell their equipment to Huawei when there are no national security concerns, thereby easing the blacklist restrictions the Commerce Department imposed in May. That concession wasn't a "general amnesty" as part of an agreement to restart trade talks with China, Larry Kudlow, the White House National Economic Council director, clarified on Sunday.
The U.S. has been engaged in a global campaign to block Huawei from so-called 5G communications networks, calling the company a security threat. The Trump administration has alleged the Chinese government could use Huawei's products to spy on countries that use them in their networks.
White House trade adviser Peter Navarro on Tuesday said Huawei's involvement in 5G networks remains a "national security concern” but the sale of a “small amount of low-level chips” isn't a “bad thing” if it persuades China to return to trade negotiations.
In the Texas lawsuit, Huawei is challenging a section of the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act that bars federal agencies from buying Huawei equipment. The law passed by Congress last year also prohibits federal contractors from using Huawei equipment, and blocks federal loan or grant recipients from using the funds to buy the company's equipment or services.
Huawei claims Congress abused its powers by sanctioning the company without a hearing or trial. The law violates constitutional prohibitions against the legislature singling out individuals for punishment, the company said in its request to have the section that targets its equipment declared unconstitutional.
The case is Huawei Technologies USA Inc. v. U.S., 19-CV-00159, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas (Sherman).
To contact the reporter on this story: Edvard Pettersson in Los Angeles at epettersson@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: David Glovin at dglovin@bloomberg.net, Peter Elstrom, Jillian Ward
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.