`Blade Runner 2049' Gains Momentum as Rare Reboot That Works
(Bloomberg) -- Hollywood's practice of mining classic films for remakes and sequels has led to several disasters, from “Ben-Hur” to “Ghostbusters.” But a new “Blade Runner” film has a shot at paying off for the team of studios and financiers who helped will it into existence.
“Blade Runner 2049,” opening this weekend, continues the dystopian sci-fi story of Harrison Ford's Los Angeles cop, Rick Deckard, following up on the 1982 film directed by Ridley Scott. The sequel takes a big risk by revisiting a cult classic that's revered as a masterpiece. It's distributed by Warner Bros. and Sony Corp., which co-financed the project along with the film companies of FedEx Corp. founder Fred Smith and mining magnate Frank Giustra.
There are signs that the gamble will pay off. Shawn Robbins, the chief analyst at Box Office Pro, has ratcheted up his domestic ticket sales forecast by about 20 percent on positive buzz and Oscar talk after private screenings and marketing efforts. His concerns have subsided that the R-rated movie might be too esoteric for casual film fans. Robbins now estimates an opening weekend of $54 million, in line with mainstream releases this year such as “War for the Planet of the Apes” and “Cars 3.”
“It doesn't feel like the kind of sequels they make these days,” Erik Davis, managing editor at ticket-booking site Fandango, said of “Blade Runner 2049.” By delving into the world of artificial intelligence and the role of technology in human life, the film “is more relevant now than when it first came out,” he said.
That is music to the ears of Time Warner Inc.'s Warner Bros., which has the North American rights. The Burbank, California-based studio is enjoying a stronger run at the box office this year, with the hit “Wonder Woman” and the critical darling “Dunkirk” making up for disappointments such as “The Lego Ninjago Movie” and “King Arthur.” If “Blade Runner” does well this weekend, it could open the door for further films set in the same world.
“We are in a great place,” Jeff Goldstein, head of domestic distribution at Warner Bros., said in an interview. The studio has a more conservative $45 million opening weekend forecast. The film may help Warner Bros pass the $2 billion domestic box office tally this year for only the second time, Goldstein said.
“Blade Runner 2049” got off to a good start in Thursday night screenings, bringing in $4 million, according to Warner Bros. That puts it ahead of science-fiction hits from previous years released in October, including 2015's “The Martian” and 2013's “Gravity.”
While Warner Bros. co-produced and distributed the original movie, Smith's Alcon Entertainment made the sequel based on plans from producers Bud and Cynthia Yorkin. The Los Angeles-based film producer, which also backed Oscar-nominated “The Blind Side,” secured the support of Scott as executive producer on the new one.
The film ultimately cost $150 million to produce, with Sony providing $90 million and Alcon $60 million, according to people familiar with the matter, not including marketing costs. Sony will share in the profits and has the rights to distribute the film internationally.
The filmmakers got subsidies from Hungary, New Zealand and France, along with three different Canadian tax credits, according to production notes. Still, the big budget and marketing campaign mean “Blade Runner 2049” will need to bring in more than $400 million worldwide to break even and $675 million to be considered a real success, according to Jeff Bock, senior analyst at box-office researcher Exhibitor Relations. That's on par with 2014 sci-fi hit “Interstellar.”
Another key player in the film's development was Giustra's Vancouver-based production company Thunderbird, which invests in entertainment properties. “We had the opportunity to invest in the underlying rights and I approached my friend and partner Frank Giustra. Frank didn't hesitate,” said Tim Gamble, a founding partner and vice chairman of Thunderbird.
Gamble said Giustra, the co-founder of Lions Gate Entertainment Corp., considers the first “Blade Runner” a “brilliant piece of art.” The new film is by far the most high-profile project so far for Thunderbird, whose other investments include “Beat Bugs,” the Netflix children's series inspired by the music of the Beatles. “We are grateful to be a part of this major franchise, ” Gamble said.
For Sony, the movie adds to the momentum after the successful reboot of its “Spider-Man” franchise this year and critical acclaim for heist movie “Baby Driver.” The studio is looking to rebound after several 2016 box-office disappointments, such as its attempted revival of “Ghostbusters.”
Sony's domestic box-office sales are up 1.9 percent this year, according to data from researcher Box Office Mojo, compared with the industry's 4.7 percent decline through last weekend. Warner Bros. is having an even better 2017, up 6.9 percent.
“Blade Runner 2049” is already a hit with critics, with 91 percent giving positive reviews, according to aggregator Rottentomatoes.com, and some are putting it on early lists of Oscar contenders. One challenge for the movie: its long run time of two hours and 43 minutes.
In addition to Ford, the movie has a bankable lead, heartthrob Ryan Gosling, and co-stars including Jared Leto. Director Denis Villeneuve is a rising star who was nominated for an Academy Award earlier this year for “Arrival,” which Sony also distributed internationally.
Whether this is the first of a new world of “Blade Runner” movies will be up to the audience, Tom Rothman, chairman of Sony's film studio, said in an interview.
“It's an expansive universe with room for storytelling,” Rothman said. “That's the difference between franchises that audience embrace and those they are tired of.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Anousha Sakoui in Los Angeles at asakoui@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Crayton Harrison at tharrison5@bloomberg.net, Dave McCombs
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.