California Governor Threatens to Step In and ‘Restructure’ PG&E
(Bloomberg) -- California Governor Gavin Newsom threatened a state takeover of PG&E Corp. unless the beleaguered utility giant makes a swift exit from bankruptcy and improves its operations to reduce wildfire risks.
“We are gaming out a backup plan if Pacific Gas and Electric is unable to secure its own fate and future,” Newsom said in a media briefing Friday. Among options being considered are a state-led restructuring of the utility, he said.
Newsom has repeatedly bashed PG&E for its handling of a series of intentional and unprecedented mass blackouts -- intended to keep power lines from igniting fires during high winds -- that have left millions of Californians in the dark. The governor has expressed frustration that the utility hasn't moved faster to improve operations and speed up investments needed to prevent future shutoffs.
The swiftest way to transform the company is to get it out of bankruptcy quickly, Newsom said. He will hold a meeting next week with PG&E executives, shareholders, wildfire victims and creditors to help make sure the company meets a state-mandated target to exit Chapter 11 by June 30, 2020.
“If the parties fail to reach an agreement quickly to begin this process of transformation, the state will not hesitate to step in and restructure the utility,” he said in a statement. “All options are on the table.”
Disappointed with the utility's management of the blackouts, Newsom has encouraged others to bid on PG&E, including billionaire Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Stakeholder Battle
“We share the governor's focus on reducing wildfire risk across California and understand that PG&E must play a role in these efforts,” the San Francisco-based utility said in a statement. “We welcome the governor's and the state's engagement on these vital matters and share the same goal of fairly resolving the wildfire claims and exiting the Chapter 11 process as quickly as possible.”
Read more: evacuations mount in Southern California as wildfire spreads
Some of Wall Street's biggest names are battling in court for control of the utility, which filed for bankruptcy in January in the face of $30 billion of estimated liabilities from wildfires blamed on its equipment.
A group of bondholders led by billionaire Paul Singer's Elliott Management Corp. and Pacific Investment Management Co. recently won court approval to pitch their reorganization plan alongside that of PG&E and its shareholders. The bondholders have aligned with wildfire victims with a plan that sets aside billions more for individual fire claims and would virtually wipe out existing shareholders. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Dennis Montali recently ordered the principal parties in the case into mediation, a request made by PG&E.
Newsom said that he was appointing his cabinet secretary, Ana Matosantos, to serve as the state's “energy czar.” She will head up a team of advisers that will develop the backup plan for PG&E should the state need to take action.
Read more: How California's quiet fire season suddenly turned into chaos
He added that the team will evaluate several possible scenarios for PG&E -- including converting it into a state-operated utility or a “privately managed” government entity.
Newsom said PG&E could be structured like the state's independent grid operator, which is a non-profit corporation set up to manage the flow of power across the state. He has also tasked his team to craft a blueprint on how to transform the company's culture and operations that will be presented in the coming weeks.
“PG&E as we know it cannot persist and continue,” he said. “It has to be completely transformed.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Mark Chediak in San Francisco at mchediak@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Lynn Doan at ldoan6@bloomberg.net, Boris Korby, Kara Wetzel
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Foreign Investors Own Half Of HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank. An LTCG Cut Could Matter Most Here
Foreign portfolio investors have US$115 billion parked in HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank. If the government cuts long-term capital gains tax, Jefferies says returning foreign money could land here first.
-
'Never Seen This Level Of Negativity': Sandeep Tandon Says The Next Rally May Be Closer Than You Think
Veteran investor Sandeep Tandon says foreign selling is easing, large-caps are due a comeback and mid-caps are crowded, while he turns positive on gold, power and pharma this Diwali.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?