A $25 Trillion Stock Rally Was Built on GDP Growth No Better Than This
(Bloomberg) -- Terrified that shrinking forecasts for economic growth are sounding the death knell for equities? You wouldn't be the first.
It's more or less a bull-market tradition to peek at growth estimates right around Thanksgiving and declare the rally in stocks doomed. In the current version, the S&P 500 is up 24% ahead of a year in which gross domestic product isn't expected to crack 2%. Divergences like that are symptoms of euphoria that investors always regret.
Right? Well, except for in 2012, when stocks rose 13% in the runup to a year in which the economy did no better than it's expected to do in 2020. Oh and 2010, when pretty much the same thing occurred. In fact, the consensus prediction for 2020 GDP matches the average annual growth rate over the last decade, a period in which stocks surged sixfold.
Not that it couldn't be different this time around. A lot could go wrong in the next 12 months. But anyone premising an investment thesis on anemic growth expectations should be aware that waiting for the economy to do a lot better than it's supposed to in 2020 has been a recipe for missing $25 trillion of share appreciation.
“If you're driving at 50 miles-an-hour and you slow to 30, you're still going forward,” said Hank Smith, co-chief investment officer at Haverford Trust, which manages $9.5 billion. “That doesn't mean you have to extrapolate that slowdown into negative territory. That's what too many analysts and pundits are doing.”
With just weeks left in a banner year for equities, investors and analysts are marking up their playbooks for 2020. As usual, the fate of the American economy is a key point of contention, with some predicting a rebound and others arguing this year's gains are predicated upon a a growth pick-up that won't happen.
The average forecast in a Bloomberg survey of roughly 70 contributors holds that the U.S. economy will expand 1.8% next year. Sure, that's the slowest annual rate of GDP growth since 2013, but it also matches the average of the bull market -- a period in which the S&P 500 has notched an annualized gain of 17.7%.
That isn't stopping strategists at Societe Generale, Morgan Stanley, and UBS Group AG from predicting a slump in stocks, on expectations for slow economic growth or shrinking corporate profits. According to Lisa Shalett, the chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, the correction could reach 15%, probably sometime in the first half of next year.
In her view, which reflects that of the firm's chief U.S. equity strategist Mike Wilson, a lack of margin expansion for corporations is a key concern. Even if top line revenue expands 2% to 4% next year off of GDP growth of 2%, it'll be very difficult for bottom line profits to grow at the near 10% rate that's expected.
“Our caution is really that so much good news is priced into this market,” Shalett said by phone. “We have a market that is forecasting this rebound in GDP in 2020 and has consensus forecasts for S&P 500 earnings up 9 to 10%. From where we sit, it's going to be very hard for companies in that kind of an environment to have profit growth of 10% when you're looking at a labor market that is already tight.”
A perhaps more likely outcome is that slow growth will be enough to encourage single-digit equity gains next year, barring a re-escalation of the U.S.-China trade war or severe deterioration in economic data, Florian Regnery, a cross-asset strategist at Commerzbank AG, said in a message.
Haverford Trust's Smith sees the possibility for the S&P 500 to deliver a total return of as much as 12% next year with the backdrop of a slight pickup in economic growth. Even if GDP growth stagnates below 2%, stock returns will still likely remain positive, he said, and subdued economic growth has its benefits.
“The advantages are that's not enough to create excesses, and excesses are what kill economies,” Smith said by phone. “Excesses in inflation, excesses in inventories, excesses in misallocation of capital, excesses in employment. If you're only growing 2%, it's hard to create that.”
That's part of the reason such a shallow economic expansion since the Global Financial Crisis has bred the longest one in history. With time passing by and the S&P 500 headed for the second best year of the bull market, some investors fear 2020 will be anything but spectacular.
Those concerns may be overdone, according to Bloomberg Intelligence. Since 1929, the S&P 500 has gained more than 20% in 23 separate years, and in the years that followed, returns were positive 70% of the time, BI data show. What's more is the average return those years was 7.4%, greater than the benchmark's long-term annual return.
“An object in motion stays in motion,” wrote equity strategists including Gina Martin Adams. “Historical experience suggests fears that stocks are doomed for a cooling-off period following the strong gain of 2019 may be overblown.”
--With assistance from Vildana Hajric.
To contact the reporter on this story: Sarah Ponczek in New York at sponczek2@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Jeremy Herron at jherron8@bloomberg.net, Chris Nagi
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.