U.S. Supreme Court Won't Make PLO Pay $656 Million Terror Award
(Bloomberg) -- The Palestinian Authority and the Palestine Liberation Organization escaped a $656 million damage award as the U.S. Supreme Court turned away an appeal by American victims of six bombing and shooting attacks in Israel.
The justices, without comment, left intact a lower court decision that said the Palestinian entities didn't have enough of a connection to the U.S. to let them be sued under a federal anti-terrorism law.
The rebuff came at the urging of the Trump administration, which said the appeal didn't warrant Supreme Court review.
The PLO and Palestinian Authority were accused of supporting two groups responsible for some of the attacks, Hamas and the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, by providing money, explosives, training and personnel. Both Hamas and the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade are designated as terrorist groups by the U.S. government.
A Manhattan federal jury awarded the victims and their families $218.5 million, an amount that was tripled under the 1992 Anti-Terrorism Act. A New York-based federal appeals court threw out the award, saying U.S. courts generally lacked jurisdiction to hear suits against the PLO and Palestinian Authority.
In court papers, the victims contended the appeals court ruling “essentially nullifies the Anti-Terrorism Act by erecting a nearly insuperable obstacle to relief for American victims of terrorism abroad.”
The PLO and Palestinian Authority said that the lower court applied “settled” legal principles and that the Supreme Court shouldn't “inject itself into this highly charged foreign affairs debate.”
The Trump administration didn't directly defend the appeals court ruling. The Justice Department said instead that the ruling didn't conflict with any other appeals court decision or Supreme Court opinion.
The Supreme Court rejected a similar appeal in 2014 when it refused to hear arguments from thousands of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the U.S., who sought to sue Middle Eastern companies and people for allegedly providing support to al-Qaeda.
The latest case is Sokolow v. Palestine Liberation Organization, 16-1071.
To contact the reporter on this story: Greg Stohr in Washington at gstohr@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Joe Sobczyk at jsobczyk@bloomberg.net, Ros Krasny, Larry Liebert
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.