Trump’s $3.8 Billion Border Wall Diversion Targeted by ACLU
(Bloomberg) -- The Trump administration is violating the Constitution by diverting an additional $3.8 billion in military funds to his planned U.S. border wall with Mexico, a new lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union and Sierra Club claims.
Filed Friday in federal court in San Francisco, the suit says the administration illegally bypassed Congress when President Donald Trump tapped money earmarked for weapons systems and other military expenditures. The construction will also have devastating effects on the environment, according to the complaint.
The suit was filed in federal court in San Francisco -- the same court that last year repeatedly found Trump's initial transfer of over $6 billion in military funds for the wall was unlawful.
“Multiple courts have ruled that President Donald Trump has no authority to spend billion of dollars appropriated for the military to carry out his campaign promise to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border,” the complaints says. “Rather than abide by these decisions, President Trump has doubled down on diverting military funds to border wall construction.”
The president notched a win in July, however, when the Supreme Court said he could use some military funds even while lawsuits made their way through the legal system.
Just yesterday, a federal judge in Seattle barred the government from diverting $89 million to the wall from a construction project at a submarine base in Washington state. The diversion of funds intended for military has attracted criticism on both sides of the aisle.
Trump and his Republican allies have argued that a border wall with Mexico is urgently needed to stem the flow of tens of thousands of undocumented immigrants entering the country illegally from Central and South America. The administration has argued the immigrants are a drain on taxpayer resources and a threat to public safety.
Waste of Money
But Congress has largely refused to fund Trump's wall at the level necessary to construct even a substantial portion of it. Democrats have called the wall a waste of money and a symbol of the president's negative view of immigrants.
Congress's 2020 appropriations bill, which Trump signed into law in December, included $1.37 billion for the wall project -- the same amount Congress approved in 2019 and far less than the president requested, according to the complaint. Despite that limitation, Defense Secretary Mark Esper on Feb. 13 said the Pentagon would divert $3.8 billion in 2020 military funds to the wall, the suit says.
The same day, Trump extended the national emergency he declared last year to circumvent Congress.
“The destruction of cultural sites, Tribal burial grounds, endangered species, protected cacti and water resources shows that Trump will stop at nothing for this wall — not irreplaceable resources nor the Constitution,” Gloria Smith, a lawyer for the Oakland, California-based Sierra Club, said in a statement.
To contact the reporter on this story: Erik Larson in New York at elarson4@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: David Glovin at dglovin@bloomberg.net, Anthony Lin
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.