Trump Appeals to Supreme Court on Financial-Records Subpoena
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his challenge to a House subpoena for financial records held by his accounting firm, saying lawmakers are exceeding their authority with a broad probe into his personal and business affairs.
The appeal comes in one of three subpoena cases speeding toward a potential Supreme Court showdown. The justices are already scheduled to discuss at their Dec. 13 private conference whether to take up Trump's challenge to a subpoena by a New York prosecutor for his tax returns.
In addition, the president's lawyers have said they will file an emergency request Thursday asking the court to temporarily stop Deutsche Bank AG and Capital One Financial Corp. from handing over Trump's financial records to the House.
The cases aren't directly tied to the ongoing House impeachment probe, which centers on Trump's push to have Ukraine announce investigations that could help him politically. The cases will test the justices' willingness to shield the president from investigations into his personal and business affairs. Federal appeals courts ruled against Trump in all three disputes.
The Supreme Court has already temporarily blocked the House subpoena in the case that was the subject of Trump's formal appeal Thursday, involving the accounting firm Mazars USA.
‘All Statements'
The demand from the House Oversight and Reform Committee seeks “all statements of financial condition, annual statements, periodic financial reports, and independent auditors' reports” in Mazars's possession, as well as supporting documentation and related communications. It covers Trump's individual finances as well as those of the Trump Organization over an eight-year period.
The panel says it wants the documents because it is considering revising the federal ethics-in-government laws. Trump's lawyers say the primary purpose is law enforcement, something they say is beyond Congress's legislative powers.
“This is a case of firsts,” Trump said in his new . “It is the first time that Congress has subpoenaed personal records of a sitting president. It is the first time that Congress has issued a subpoena, under the guise of its legislative powers, to investigate the president for illegal conduct. And it is the first time a court has upheld any congressional subpoena for any sitting president's records of any kind.”
In the New York case, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. is investigating whether Trump's business falsified records to disguise hush payments to two women who claimed they had sex with Trump before he took office. In an appeal filed last month, Trump contended that presidents have broad immunity from criminal investigations while in office.
In the Deutsche case, two other House committees are seeking financial records for Trump, his children and the Trump organization. Those committees say they have a variety of legislative interests and are investigating money laundering, terrorist financing and Russian efforts to influence U.S. elections.
The new case is Trump v. Mazars, 19-715. The New York case is Trump v. Vance, 19-635.
To contact the reporter on this story: Greg Stohr in Washington at gstohr@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Joe Sobczyk at jsobczyk@bloomberg.net, Laurie Asséo, Ros Krasny
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.