Tiger Global—The 'Big Client' Behind Ketan Parekh's Front-Running Scandal
The US-based "big client" through which Ketan Parekh was allegedly front-running trades was Tiger Global Management, as per the data available on the stock exchanges.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India on Thursday imposed a liability of Rs 65.7 crore on Ketan Parekh—earlier involved in the infamous stock market scam of 2000—in the extended front running case. Along with Parekh, the liability was also imposed on Rohit Salgaokar and other accused.
SEBI, in its 188-page interim order, found that Salgaocar—a Singapore citizen—had connections with a "US-based fund house" through which he knew about the trades that were to be taken up by it.
Two funds of the "Big Client" sold 52.5 lakh shares of PB Fintech Ltd. on Nov. 11, 2022, according to the order. The regulator did not provide the name of the US-based fund.
During the said date, Tiger Global Eight Holdings and Internet Fund III Pte Ltd—units of Tiger Global sold 1.27 crore shares cumulatively, at an average price of Rs 374.6 per share, according to the block deal data from BSE.
GRD Securities Ltd., Salasar Stock Broking Ltd. and Anirudh Damani have matched their trades with the "big client" for 20.61 lakh shares, SEBI statement said.
A spokesperson for Tiger Global confirmed to NDTV Profit they traded PB Fintech shares, but denied the allegations of trading those shares as per the SEBI order. "We did not trade the identified securities other than PB Fintech, nor did we trade through the named brokers or persons in the SEBI order," the spokesperson said.
How the trade was executed:
On Nov. 11, 2022, before normal market hours, Salgaocar and the trader of the "big client" were discussing about Policybazaar (PB Fintech), according to the SEBI order.
Trader of the "big client" confirmed to Salgaocar that they would sell Policybazaar's shares that day, the order said.
From 9:00 am to 9:58 am, Parekh gave multiple instructions to sell scrip of Policybazaar at various price in the WhatsApp group “Jack-Saro”, it added.
As per the SEBI order, Parekh used to work systematically once he got the information from Salgaocar and executed trades from several accounts, causing illegal gains.
Further, Salgaocar used to tell traders of the US-based fund the name of the particular Indian trading member to whom the deal ticket was to be sent for execution of trades. About 90% of trades of this fund that were executed by Motilal and Nuvama were referred by Salgaocar, as per the order.
SEBI observed "Parekh and Salgaocar devised the scheme," and that the earlier debarred market operator (Parekh) had violated security law provisions several times.
Parekh was earlier banned by SEBI in 2003 for 14 years on allegations of insider trading, price rigging and illegal diversion of bank funds into the stock market.
-
'Never Seen This Level Of Negativity': Sandeep Tandon Says The Next Rally May Be Closer Than You Think
Veteran investor Sandeep Tandon says foreign selling is easing, large-caps are due a comeback and mid-caps are crowded, while he turns positive on gold, power and pharma this Diwali.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.