Supreme Court Issues Notice To Unitech On Contempt Plea Of Homebuyers
The Supreme Court today sought a response from real estate major Unitech Ltd. on a plea seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against it for alleged non-compliance of its order to compensate some hassled home buyers for delayed delivery of their dream homes.
A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud issued notice to the real estate firm on a joint contempt petition moved by 13 homebuyers who claimed they were yet to receive a compensation of Rs 80,000 each as per the directions of the apex court on Sept. 20 last year.
The bench was hearing the contempt plea, moved through advocate Brajesh Kumar, by the homebuyers including one Satish Kumar Pandey.
The plea claimed that the apex court order directing the firm to pay Rs 80,000 each as compensation to 39 homebuyers towards litigation cost and causing harassment to them, has not been complied with as yet. However, some of the beneficiaries of the order have been paid, it added.
The petitioners said they had personally approached the competent authorities of Unitech Ltd, but they did not pay any heed to the requests.
The respondent has deliberately and wilfully disobeyed the order of this court, which is writ apparent from its conduct and, therefore, a clear cut case for initiation of proceeding for contempt of the order dated Sept. 20, 2017 is made out.Supreme Court
The apex court had directed real estate firm to pay Rs 80,000 each as compensation to 39 home buyers towards litigation cost and causing harassment to them.
The court had disposed of the appeal filed by the real estate company against the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and asked it to pay the cost within eight weeks to the home buyers.
The 39 homebuyers had booked flats in Unitech's Vista housing project in Gurugram and sought a refund of their principal amount, totalling Rs 16.55 crore with interest, after the developer, who had promised to give them possession by 2012, delayed it.
The apex court had modified the NCDRC order on the issue of compensation and awarded a compensation of Rs 80,000, besides the refund of the money invested by the home buyers who had said that they did not want the flats.
Earlier, the firm had told the court that it had complied with the direction on refund of principal and interest to the homebuyers of its Gurugram project.
Prior to this, the court had directed the firm to deposit 14 percent interest on Rs 16.55 crore invested by the 39 buyers and warned it that failure to pay could invite attaching the realtor's property.
Over two dozen home buyers of Unitech's housing projects in Noida in Uttar Pradesh and Gurgaon in Haryana had approached the NCDRC after the builder had failed to give them possession of the flats as per schedule. The consumer forum had asked Unitech to refund the money to the homebuyers with interest.
-
'Never Seen This Level Of Negativity': Sandeep Tandon Says The Next Rally May Be Closer Than You Think
Veteran investor Sandeep Tandon says foreign selling is easing, large-caps are due a comeback and mid-caps are crowded, while he turns positive on gold, power and pharma this Diwali.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.