PennEast Pipeline Gets High Court Hearing on Land-Use Rights
(Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a PennEast Pipeline Co. appeal that aims to jump-start a planned natural-gas line by securing key land-use rights from New Jersey.
The proposed 116-mile pipeline would carry as much as 1 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day from northern Pennsylvania to New Jersey. PennEast is a joint venture of five companies including Southern Co. and Enbridge Inc.
The decision to hear the case boosts an industry that has fallen out of regulatory favor with President Joe Biden in the White House. Already Biden has canceled a permit for the Keystone XL oil pipeline and ordered a pause in the sale of new oil and gas leases on federal land.
At issue at the Supreme Court is a provision in the U.S. Natural Gas Act that lets pipeline companies use the federal government's eminent domain power. After the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approved the pipeline in 2018, PennEast sued to gain access to more than 40 parcels that are either owned or partially controlled by New Jersey.
But a Philadelphia-based federal appeals court said that, while the law gives companies eminent domain powers, it doesn't let them sue states to enforce those rights. The panel pointed to the Constitution's 11th Amendment, which limits the circumstances in which private parties can sue states without their consent.
Unless the appeals court ruling is overturned, the pipeline may have to find a new route through New Jersey or turn to Congress to get the needed authority.
April Arguments
The Supreme Court said it will hear arguments in April, meaning a ruling is likely by late June. The justices acted after then-President Donald Trump's administration urged them to take up the case.
Tony Cox, chairman of PennEast's board of managers, called the court's decision to take the case a “major step forward” toward safe, affordable domestic energy.
“Congress passed the Natural Gas Act specifically to avoid state and local vetoes of interstate projects found by federal regulators to be in the public need and benefit,” Cox said in an emailed statement. Cox said the company anticipates putting the first phase of the project into service in 2022 and the second phase into service in 2024.
Opponents of the pipeline urged the court to protect states and their environmental protection efforts from federal overreach.
“We need our highest court to reaffirm to fossil fuel companies that they do not have the ability to trample over the rights of the state to protect its natural resources for the benefit of its communities,” said Maya van Rossum, who leads the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, a conservation group.
The case is PennEast v. New Jersey, 19-1039.
©2021 Bloomberg L.P.
-
'Never Seen This Level Of Negativity': Sandeep Tandon Says The Next Rally May Be Closer Than You Think
Veteran investor Sandeep Tandon says foreign selling is easing, large-caps are due a comeback and mid-caps are crowded, while he turns positive on gold, power and pharma this Diwali.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.