Ryan Terror Bill Not Strong Enough on Gun Control, Democrats Say
(Bloomberg) -- House Democrats said Friday they won't support legislation Speaker Paul Ryan plans to bring to a vote next week that seeks to prevent terrorists from purchasing firearms.
Following their dramatic 25-hour House chamber sit-in last week to demand votes on gun bills, Democrats contend the Republican proposal doesn't provide strong enough action and warn that renewed protests are possible after the House reconvenes Tuesday.
In a private conference call Friday, House Democrats led by Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi concluded they will oppose the Republican bill, viewing it as all-but-written by the pro-gun National Rifle Association, according to a Democratic aide who sought anonymity to describe the call.
Instead, they will continue to press for votes on legislation broadening background checks for gun sales and banning firearm sales to people on the government's “no-fly” list of suspected terrorists. Democratic calls for such legislation intensified after the killings of 49 people in a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida.
Ryan's office on Friday released details of the counterterrorism measure he plans to bring to the floor next week, H.R. 5611.
“While the enemy's tactics are evolving, the Obama administration's strategy to defeat radical Islamist extremism is not. We have to step up our game," Ryan of Wisconsin said in a statement. "This counterterrorism legislation provides new tools to protect our homeland, including a provision to prevent terrorists from buying guns. It is a responsible measure that confronts this threat while protecting the rights of law-abiding citizens."
Homeland Security
The bill would establish within the Homeland Security Department an office to combat "Islamist terrorist radicalization" in the U.S. American passports would be revoked from people who join or aid foreign terrorist organizations.
The gun-related provision would give the attorney general up to three days to seek a court order barring the sale of a firearm to someone being investigated as a known or suspected terrorist. If the petition is denied, the government would pay the costs and attorneys' fees. The measure is similar to one proposed by second-ranking Senate Republican John Cornyn of Texas, which Democrats blocked in the Senate as not providing enough time to show that a person should be blocked from buying a gun.
The Republican measure also would require law enforcement to be notified if a person investigated within the past five years as a known or suspected terrorist tries to buy a gun.
During the conference call Friday, Democrats decided that if Republicans don't accept their amendments to the bill, they will discuss what possible actions to take. Democratic Representative John Larson of Connecticut said in an interview Thursday that he and fellow sit-in organizer John Lewis of Georgia wrote a letter to Ryan asking for a face-to-face meeting to discuss gun legislation.
Asked if more House floor sit-ins are possible, Larson said, "It's hard to say. We don't know what's going to happen." He said Democrats were considering other options such as a protest march.
Michael Bloomberg, the founder and majority owner of Bloomberg LP, is an advocate of assault-weapon restrictions and serves on the advisory board of Everytown for Gun Safety, a gun-control group.
--With assistance from James Rowley To contact the reporter on this story: Billy House in Washington at bhouse5@bloomberg.net. To contact the editors responsible for this story: Kevin Whitelaw at kwhitelaw@bloomberg.net, Laurie Asseo, Justin Blum
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.
-
Everything, Everywhere, All At Once: Dalal Street's Week To Forget | Joining The Dots
Visa curbs, a Starlink spat and cancer drug caps: what connects this week's shocks for Indian markets
-
India Is Going Abroad For Critical Minerals. But It May Take Years To Pay Off | The Reason Why
Although India's steps are in the right direction, they remain modest compared with India's growing dependence.
-
When Everyone Has AI, What Gives You An Edge?
India's young workforce is entering an uncertain world of work where powerful AI tools are becoming widely accessible. The advantage will belong to those who combine deep expertise with digital fluency, and the distinctly human capabilities that technology cannot manufacture.