Ross Says Didn't Knowingly Lend to Sanctioned Russians at Bank
(Bloomberg) -- U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said he's not aware of the Bank of Cyprus Pcl having any significant dealings with Russians or other individuals and entities under U.S. sanctions while he was on its board of directors.
Ross, 79, resigned as vice chairman and member of the bank's board on March 1 after he was confirmed to his position in President Donald Trump's cabinet. Ross said in response to questions about the bank's business with Russian entities that no large loans he approved knowingly went to a person under sanctions.
“None of those loans went to anybody with sanctions that I'm aware of,” Ross said on CNN's “State of the Union” on Sunday. “Nor were there any great big deposits from sanctioned parties that came in while I was involved that I was I aware of.''
Asked whether the bank provided any loans to Trump's campaign, either directly or through another financial institution, Ross said, “certainly not to my knowledge.”
Five Democratic senators have been asking Ross since February to respond to questions about his and the Cyprus bank's ties to Russia and Trump's campaign. Their most recent letter to Ross was on March 10.
With Chinese President Xi Jinping scheduled meet with Trump for the first time this week, at the president's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, Ross declined to address Trump's campaign promise to have Beijing labeled a currency manipulator. That determination lies with the Treasury Department, not Commerce, Ross said.
In an interview with Bloomberg Television on Friday, Ross said that the U.S. is “about the least protectionist” and China is “one of the most protectionist” of major countries.
To contact the reporter on this story: Mark Niquette in Columbus at mniquette@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Joshua Gallu at jgallu@bloomberg.net, Ros Krasny, Bernard Kohn
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.
-
Everything, Everywhere, All At Once: Dalal Street's Week To Forget | Joining The Dots
Visa curbs, a Starlink spat and cancer drug caps: what connects this week's shocks for Indian markets
-
India Is Going Abroad For Critical Minerals. But It May Take Years To Pay Off | The Reason Why
Although India's steps are in the right direction, they remain modest compared with India's growing dependence.
-
When Everyone Has AI, What Gives You An Edge?
India's young workforce is entering an uncertain world of work where powerful AI tools are becoming widely accessible. The advantage will belong to those who combine deep expertise with digital fluency, and the distinctly human capabilities that technology cannot manufacture.