May Fires Defense Secretary Williamson Over Huawei Leak
(Bloomberg) --
U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May fired her defense secretary for revealing secret discussions about Huawei Technologies Co.'s role in Britain, as she attempted to assert control over a government that has become dominated by the battle to succeed her.
Gavin Williamson, a former government chief whip famous for keeping a tarantula on his desk, forcibly denied he was responsible for the leak from a meeting of Britain's National Security Council.
The disclosure of details of the talks, within hours of them taking place, outraged security officials and prompted ministers to write to May demanding an inquiry. They suggested the leaking was being done to try to gain advantage in the race underway in the ruling Conservative Party to succeed May.
The premier has grown used to leaks from Cabinet meetings on Brexit, as ministers fight to get their version of events out first. But this was a matter of national security.
Cabinet Secretary Mark Sedwill began an investigation, and in a meeting with Williamson on Wednesday evening, May told the defense secretary he hadn't cooperated to “the same standard” as others.
“I put to you the latest information from the investigation, which provides compelling evidence suggesting your responsibility for the unauthorized disclosure,” May wrote in her letter sacking Williamson. “No other credible version of events to explain this leak has been identified.”
Denial
Williamson denied he was responsible for the leak in his letter to May. It's rare for ministers to be fired, and more usual for them to accept an invitation to resign.
“I appreciate you offering me the option to resign, but to resign would have been to accept that I, my civil servants, my military advisers or my staff were responsible: this was not the case,” he wrote.
Williamson later told Sky News that he had been “completely and utterly screwed.” He swore on his children's life that he didn't leak the Huawei news.
A government spokesman said that while the question of criminal proceedings isn't up to the government, as far as the prime minister is concerned, the matter is now closed. The Telegraph reported Williamson said he'd welcome a police inquiry, because it would clear him.
‘Out of Control'
Briefing by Cabinet ministers “has been running out of control and we're now seeing the consequences of it,” Dominic Grieve, a Conservative MP and chairman of Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee, told Sky News. “It causes reputational damage to our country with our allies, it's really undesirable and it must stop.”
May's move to clamp down on unruly ministers came the night before local elections on Thursday, in which the Tories are expected to face a drubbing for their failure to deliver Brexit.
The opposition Labour Party said it showed the level of chaos in May's administration.
“Conservative infighting has undermined the basic functioning of government, and has now potentially put security at risk,” Labour defense spokeswoman Nia Griffith said. “The police must urgently investigate.”
The meeting last week was convened to discuss the results of a six-month review of Britain's telecom supply chain, including Huawei's role in the roll-out of so-called 5G networks. Britain is set to toughen the rules under which the Chinese firm operates in the country while stopping short of an outright ban, according to people familiar with the matter.
Allied Tensions
The issue has divided politicians, while the U.K.'s allies are also watching closely. The U.S. has warned countries not to include equipment from Huawei or other Chinese suppliers.
Huawei denies that its equipment is vulnerable to state espionage.
Williamson has previously tried to use confrontation with China as a way to burnish his credentials as defense secretary. In February, he threatened to deploy a warship to Asia on its maiden voyage, saying it would be a show of strength against China's territorial aspirations in the region.
A Chinese official accused Williamson of a return to a “Cold War mentality,” while Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond had to cancel a trip to China in the aftermath.
Williamson is also known for telling reporters that Russia should “go away and shut up.”
Trusted Adviser
The 42-year-old had been a trusted adviser to both May and her predecessor David Cameron. For three years, he was Cameron's parliamentary private secretary, responsible for managing his relationship with lawmakers.
When May became prime minister in 2016, she appointed Williamson chief whip, in charge of party discipline. When she lost her majority in the general election the following year, he negotiated the deal with Northern Ireland's Democratic Unionists that allowed her to stay in office.
May named Penny Mordaunt, who had been international development secretary, as Williamson's replacement. A Royal Navy reservist and daughter of a paratrooper, Mordaunt was the first woman to serve as armed forces minister, and is now the first female defense secretary.
Mordaunt is pro-Brexit and seen as a potential leadership candidate. She made headlines in 2014 when she used a parliamentary speech on poultry welfare laced with innuendo to settle a bet with some Navy comrades. She has argued that British foreign aid spending should be accountable to U.K. officials rather than international charities, a move that adds to her popularity among grassroots Conservatives.
Rory Stewart, another potential leader but one who has been loyal to May and backs her Brexit deal, replaces Mordaunt as international development secretary.
--With assistance from Alex Morales.
To contact the reporter on this story: Robert Hutton in London at rhutton1@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Tim Ross at tross54@bloomberg.net, Stuart Biggs, Emma Ross-Thomas
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.
-
Joining The Dots | Dark Skies, Steady Diya: Why Hope Holds This Diwali
With war, a weak rupee and foreign outflows weighing on sentiment, policymakers at the NDTV World Summit and market veterans at NDTV Profit Ignite: Diwali Edition offered the same advice: stay invested and filter out the noise.
-
The Curious Case of Equitas Small Finance Bank And A CEO Who Quit For Stock
PN Vasudevan believes persistent investor concerns over a perceived conflict of interest had become a governance overhang on Equitas Small Finance Bank's stock, even as the lender improved profitability and asset quality.
-
Talking Points This Week: AI Cash Burn, A Tiger Comeback And An India That Still Finds Its Own Path
India is not immune to higher oil or tighter global liquidity, yet its earnings base is broader, its domestic policy levers are still available.
-
Foreign Investors Own Half Of HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank. An LTCG Cut Could Matter Most Here
Foreign portfolio investors have US$115 billion parked in HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank. If the government cuts long-term capital gains tax, Jefferies says returning foreign money could land here first.
-
'Never Seen This Level Of Negativity': Sandeep Tandon Says The Next Rally May Be Closer Than You Think
Veteran investor Sandeep Tandon says foreign selling is easing, large-caps are due a comeback and mid-caps are crowded, while he turns positive on gold, power and pharma this Diwali.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.