Brexit Strategies to Decide Race to Be Next U.K. Prime Minister
(Bloomberg) -- The race to succeed David Cameron as U.K. prime minister effectively became a proxy for the broader battle over how to manage withdrawal from the European Union, with Conservative Party candidates setting out their positions on what can be achieved and how fast.
Pitches from all five candidates have focused on when Britain should trigger Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty -- the formal start of two years of negotiations with the EU -- and what level of single-market access Britain should seek, as well as how much control it will have on migration and the fate of citizens of other EU countries who are already in the U.K. They have to appeal to party lawmakers and activists, many of whom want a full and rapid departure from the EU, while avoiding too many promises they'll struggle to keep.
Home Secretary Theresa May, who supported “Remain” in the EU referendum, is the favorite to win, with bookmaker Ladbrokes Plc offering odds of 4/11, ahead of Energy Minister Andrea Leadsom in second place and Justice Secretary Michael Gove in third. Conservative lawmakers will eventually whittle the field down to two in a series of ballots starting on Tuesday. The party aims to announce a new leader by September 9.
Short Negotiations
“I intend to keep the negotiations as short as possible,” Leadsom, the last to outline her leadership challenge, said in a speech on Monday. “Neither we nor our European friends need prolonged uncertainty.”
Defence Secretary Liam Fox was more specific. “I would like to see us leaving the EU on January 1, 2019,” he told reporters. “That means we will have to activate the Article 50 process by the end of this year.”
Their Cabinet-level rivals for the post -- May, Gove and Work and Pensions Secretary Stephen Crabb -- have all urged caution, saying the U.K. needs time to establish its negotiating position and to hold preliminary talks with other European countries.
There's also significant disagreement over the EU single market, and whether retaining at least a degree of access would also mean retaining freedom of movement for EU citizens entering the U.K.
“We need to retain as much of that access as we possibly can, thus minimizing any damage to our economy from leaving the European Union,” Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond, who is backing May, told the BBC. He said that effort would be damaged by blocking immigration from the EU.
‘Protectionist Cartel'
That kind of compromise would be seen as “backsliding,” Nigel Farage told reporters after resigning as leader of the U.K. Independence Party on Monday. He described the single market as a “big business protectionist cartel.”
“I will watch the renegotiation process in Brussels like a hawk,” he said, calling for negotiators to lobby German car manufacturers and French wine makers ahead of general elections in both countries next year. “We need a prime minister who recognizes that we've got the trump cards.”
Leadsom, Gove and Fox, the three pro-Brexit candidates, have sought to undermine May by saying it would be better if the next prime minister supported leaving the EU. May, who last week said “Brexit means Brexit” as she launched her own bid, reluctantly backed “Remain” during the referendum, delivering only one major speech.
Setting out her differences with May, Leadsom said she's committed to “guaranteeing the rights” of EU citizens who already live and work in Britain. May said on Sunday that negotiators will need “to look at” their status, along with that of Britons living abroad, while signaling she wants to “guarantee a position.”
“There is no way they will be bargaining chips in our negotiations,” Leadsom said on Monday.
To contact the reporter on this story: Robert Hutton in London at rhutton1@bloomberg.net. To contact the editors responsible for this story: Alan Crawford at acrawford6@bloomberg.net, Stuart Biggs, Andrew Atkinson
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.
-
Everything, Everywhere, All At Once: Dalal Street's Week To Forget | Joining The Dots
Visa curbs, a Starlink spat and cancer drug caps: what connects this week's shocks for Indian markets
-
India Is Going Abroad For Critical Minerals. But It May Take Years To Pay Off | The Reason Why
Although India's steps are in the right direction, they remain modest compared with India's growing dependence.
-
When Everyone Has AI, What Gives You An Edge?
India's young workforce is entering an uncertain world of work where powerful AI tools are becoming widely accessible. The advantage will belong to those who combine deep expertise with digital fluency, and the distinctly human capabilities that technology cannot manufacture.