U.K. Found ‘Critical’ Weakness in Huawei Equipment
(Bloomberg) -- British intelligence forced Huawei Technologies Co. to fix flaws in its products that could have put the security of the country's networks at risk, a government agency said.
“Critical, user-facing vulnerabilities” were found in the Chinese supplier's fixed-broadband products caused by poor code quality and an old operating system, the Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre Oversight Board said in a report. “U.K. operators needed to take extraordinary action to mitigate the risk.”
The center, near Oxford in England, was set up between the Shenzhen-based technology giant and the British government in an arrangement to let the U.K.'s National Cyber Security Centre examine its hardware and software.
In the annual report published Thursday, the HCSEC Oversight Board said Huawei repaired the security issue. No exploitation of it was detected. However, the fix then created a new, different “major issue.” The incident was “further evidence that deficiencies in Huawei's engineering processes remain,” it concluded.
National Significance
The event had “national significance” and marked a rare occasion where a full description of the problem was temporarily held back from Huawei while the U.K. assessed its impact. The NCSC doesn't believe the defects identified were due to Chinese state interference, the report said.
The revelation comes at a sensitive time for Huawei after the U.K. government decided to ban telecom operators from using its gear in their fifth-generation mobile networks. The government is now reviewing Huawei's role in supplying fixed-broadband infrastructure.
The HCSEC Oversight Board said it “can only provide limited technical assurance in the security risk management of Huawei equipment in U.K. networks,” reiterating a finding of last year's report.
‘Huawei Barometer' Shows Political Pressure on 5G Rollout: Map
“This is a poor state of affairs, especially as Huawei kit will remain in U.K. networks and may even be added to it, despite the ban,” said lawmaker Bob Seely, a member of the ruling Conservative party who has campaigned for tighter restrictions on Huawei.
U.S. Blacklist
Asked about the report's findings, a spokesman for Huawei said the supplier is the only one that faces such a tough level of scrutiny.
“Huawei calls for all vendors to be evaluated against an equally robust benchmark, to improve security standards for everyone,” the spokesman said.
Britain had previously decided it could manage the risks of keeping some Huawei in 5G networks. It reversed course in July after U.S. sanctions cut off Huawei's access to American microprocessor technology. U.K. security services said this meant the security of Huawei supplies could not be assured.
The HCSEC oversight board's report covered the situation in 2019. However, it noted that Huawei had already begun to swap out American components for replacements from elsewhere toward the end of 2019 to comply with the U.S. blacklist rules. This may “limit the number of products that can be analyzed by HCSEC, and hence the number of products that can be used within the U.K,” it said.
The U.S. “entity list” made it harder for the HCSEC to do its job for a further reason, the report pointed out: The facility is owned by Huawei, so it's more difficult to obtain security monitoring products that use U.S. intellectual property. Officials are looking at how to solve the issue.
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.
-
'Never Seen This Level Of Negativity': Sandeep Tandon Says The Next Rally May Be Closer Than You Think
Veteran investor Sandeep Tandon says foreign selling is easing, large-caps are due a comeback and mid-caps are crowded, while he turns positive on gold, power and pharma this Diwali.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.