Trump's New Chief of Staff Is Destined to Fail
(Bloomberg View) -- Politicians and Washington talking heads are falling all over themselves to describe how the new White House chief of staff, John Kelly, might bring some order to a chaotic, dysfunctional and failing presidency.
Wrong. He's the wrong person for the wrong job for the wrong president. The more sanguine assessments, and contrasts to his hapless predecessor, Reince Priebus, will continue for weeks, maybe months. It won't last.
Kelly, a retired general, lacks the prerequisite skills for this powerful post, which is the consummate political job, not a command-and-control managerial task. It requires keen political sensitivities about policy priorities, Congress, the administration and bureaucracy, the party, interest groups and the voters. And a president who wants to govern.
That has been well demonstrated over half a century by successful chiefs of staff: Republicans like the Baker boys, Jim and Howard under Ronald Reagan, or Josh Bolten under George W. Bush; Democrats like Leon Panetta, John Podesta and Rahm Emanuel. And the failures have been unversed in the ways of Washington: Governor John Sununu under the first President Bush and Bill Clinton's Mack McLarty, both of whom might have been fine Cabinet members, as well as Reagan's Donald Regan.
Kelly, whose son was killed in Afghanistan, was a combat-decorated, four-star Marine Corps general much respected by his troops and peers.
While knowledgeable about the politics of the Pentagon and the Department of Homeland Security, which he has headed for the past six months, he is inexperienced in most of the ways of Washington. That's difficult to learn on the job.
His reputation as a straight shooter has suffered during his stint in the Trump administration. That might be why the president likes him. Many thought he would be a brake on Trump's mean-spirited, anti-immigration views. He hasn't been.
"We had hope for General Kelly, but we have been deeply disappointed," says Frank Sharry, a leading advocate for immigrants. He charged that the Homeland Security secretary "has done little more than front" for an assault on immigrants and has become "the pitchman for what only can be described as a mass deportation strategy."
And while many national-security experts were stunned when Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, privately tried to set up a secret communications system with the Russians, run out of Moscow, Kelly said it was "normal" and "acceptable."
Trump, who didn't serve in the military, is drawn to stars and what he sees as tough guys. He loves to call Defense Secretary James Mattis by his old nickname, "Mad Dog," something the intellectual retired four-star Marine general doesn't prefer.
After being forced to fire his first national security adviser, Mike Flynn, a retired lieutenant general who has been caught in the probe of any Trump ties to the Russians, the president was enamored with his next choice, the highly praised Army general, H.R. McMaster. But, as my colleague Eli Lake has reported, the president has soured on McMaster.
Further, it's doubtful that all the warring White House factions, working for a president with few core beliefs, lend themselves to a chain-of-command structure. It's reported that Kelly has a good relationship with Stephen Bannon, the alt-right, immigrant-bashing Trump senior adviser. That won't be reassuring to politicians like House Speaker Paul Ryan, who was close to Priebus, a fellow Wisconsinite, and who is detested by Bannon.
A Jim Baker or Leon Panetta wouldn't tolerate a fool like the new communications chief, Anthony Scaramucci, whose obscenity-laced tirade against his colleagues made him a laughing stock for late-night comedians and Washingtonians except for those working in the White House.
This gets to the overarching issue: Trump, who revels in humiliating people. He hung Priebus out to dry and is doing that now with Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Before taking office, Trump led Mitt Romney to believe he might be secretary of state; the sole purpose was to make his former rival look as if he was begging for a job that never was to be. He did the same with retired Army General David Petraeus.
And last month, with the cameras rolling, the president forced his Cabinet to declare sycophantically what a great president he was, and how lucky they were to work for him. There will be a time when he humiliates Kelly because that's what he does. Will the general pull a Priebus and just bow his head? Trump doesn't want anyone to stop him from being Trump.
The last time a military commander was named chief of staff for a beleaguered president was Al Haig 44 years ago in the Nixon administration. It didn't take long to see that the problem was the emperor, not the clothes. That's true today.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Albert R. Hunt is a Bloomberg View columnist. He was the executive editor of Bloomberg News, before which he was a reporter, bureau chief and executive Washington editor at the Wall Street Journal.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Katy Roberts at kroberts29@bloomberg.net.
For more columns from Bloomberg View, visit http://www.bloomberg.com/view.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.