Theranos Directors Pay No Price for Holmes’s Fraud
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Tyler Shultz, a former Theranos Inc. employee and whistleblower, shared his relief Monday night that the company's founder, Elizabeth Holmes, had been convicted of fraud.
“This has been a long chapter of my life. I am happy that justice has been served and that this saga is finally in my rearview mirror,” he wrote on Twitter. “Hope to inspire other young professionals to hold their leaders accountable.”
Shultz isn't a household name, but his late grandfather, former Secretary of State George Shultz, sure was. The elder Shultz also sat on Theranos's board of directors and ignored his grandson's warnings that Holmes was staging an elaborate farce at her company rather than revolutionizing blood-testing.
Tyler Shultz began ringing alarms in 2014 about doctored research and shoddy quality controls at Theranos. But Holmes and the company's president, Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, shunted him aside, according to John Carreyrou, the author and reporter who first chronicled the grift. George Shultz allied himself with Holmes and Balwani, creating a family rift and prompting his grandson to alert regulators and talk to Carreyrou instead.
George Shultz was one of several marquee names on the Theranos board. And with Holmes now facing the possibility of years behind bars it's worth remembering that feckless directors failed to rein her in. It's also a reminder of how weak corporate governance — and overly compliant but handsomely compensated directors — have regularly plagued Silicon Valley startups and larger companies across the business landscape.
At one point, Theranos's board also included former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger; former Defense Secretary William Perry; former senators Sam Nunn and William Frist; Richard Kovacevich, a former chief executive officer of Wells Fargo & Co.; William Foege, the former director of the Centers for Disease Control; Gary Roughead, a former U.S. Navy admiral; Riley P. Bechtel, a former board chairman of Bechtel Group Inc., and James Mattis, a former U.S. Marine Corps general who later served as a defense secretary in the Trump administration.
That's an illustrious collection. But I'd guess that many of those men were on the board for window dressing. Some may have been there to help raise funds, and at least a couple (maybe only two?) were directors because of their medical expertise. Others may have offered useful connections to a company planning to sell its blood-testing devices to the military. But fame and bragging rights seem to have been at work in their selection as much as anything else.
There's an argument to be made that the Theranos board was an outlier in Silicon Valley. Institutional investors with meaningful financial stakes — and an interest in successful outcomes — typically populate startup boards. Other directors are routinely recruited for specialized knowledge that helps a new venture navigate a complex industry. Still others, the argument goes, don't rely solely on reassurances and communication from a startup's leaders (as George Shultz did) but instead dig deeply into its operations to learn more.
Perhaps that's the case, but some of the clown car crackups that have stained Silicon Valley suggest that well-functioning and vigilant boards are not nearly as prevalent as some advocates claim.
Even if you accept the idea that these things eventually sort themselves out and that's the price of admission if you want an innovative and kinetic ecosystem for startups, Theranos should also nag. Holmes burned through $600 million of other people's money, and lied without remorse. Patients who relied on Theranos's services said that their lives were upended by faulty readings. Holmes was convicted of defrauding investors but not of harming her company's patients, a measure of how hard it is to fully levy justice when it comes to white-collar crimes.
Tyler Shultz had been working for Theranos only for several months when he became convinced something was amiss. Yet Theranos's board sat by for years as the company's problems snowballed, and it did so without consequence. Holmes now stands to serve prison time for her handiwork, while her former directors merely stopped cashing their checks and attended to their reputations.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Timothy L. O'Brien is a senior columnist for Bloomberg Opinion.
©2022 Bloomberg L.P.
-
India's Troika Of Good Luck | Joining The Dots
A weaker Trump, a cooling AI trade and resilient earnings have put Indian markets back in favour. Rising inflation could spoil the party.
-
Talking Points This Week: Leadership Shock At Nvidia, Earnings Strength, And The Fog Over Hormuz
The Anthropic IPO pricing and first trading day, Nvidia's upcoming earnings, and any fresh signals from Iran will set the tone for the following week.
-
Signature Play: The Classic Cocktail Is Dead. Or Is It?
Classic cocktails are disappearing from India's cocktail menus. But they're still being ordered, taught to bartenders and borrowed from. So, who's really having the last drink?
-
A New Samvat Wishlist: Inclusive Prosperity And Human Development
India has strengthened its economic foundations through infrastructure, digital access and enterprise. Its next growth chapter must deepen productivity, create better livelihoods and widen participation in prosperity.
-
Love, Sex Aur Dhokha: The Audacious Plot To Spy On Jensen Huang
A Taipei dinner, a Singapore chip buyer and a suspected Chinese asset: inside the alleged spy operation that got close to NVIDIA's Jensen Huang.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.