The Origin of China’s Stock Market Disaster? A Private Sector Starved for Credit
(Bloomberg Businessweek) -- Chinese stocks are among the world's worst performers this year. An economy that's growing at its slowest pace since 2009 and the U.S.-China trade war are certainly dragging them down, but there's an even bigger problem: The private sector—businesses not owned or controlled by the state—is broke. The government has initiated programs to keep businesses afloat, but they're unlikely to be enough.
The cash crunch is a side effect of Beijing's recent attempts to curb risky financial behaviors. What began last year as a crackdown on lending to heavily acquisitive conglomerates such as HNA Group Co. and Dalian Wanda Group Co. has spilled over to smaller companies, squeezing their access to funding. Already shunned by the big banks, these companies were further stung by efforts to regulate peer-to-peer lenders after Ponzi scandals shook the industry, cutting off a key source of ready cash. Still keen to tamp down borrowing, Beijing pushed up interest rates and slowed approvals of bond sales, while the state banks that are the main investors in China's bond market eased up on buying.
As bond defaults rose, the government attempted to inject more cash into the economy by easing reserve requirements on banks, promising to fund bond sales by private companies and reducing some personal income taxes to encourage consumer spending. Yet, with 11 percent of the Chinese stock market's capitalization pledged as collateral on business loans, 2 trillion yuan ($290 billion) of shareholder value is still at risk, according to a Goldman Sachs estimate.
With Chinese President Xi Jinping vowing “unwavering” support for the private sector, the prospect of a collapse seems to have been averted. In a speech at an import trade fair in Shanghai on Nov. 5, Xi pledged to continue opening the Chinese economy by cutting import tariffs and importing more than $30 trillion worth of goods and $10 trillion of services in the next 15 years. Any gains from increased imports are likely to accrue to state-owned firms, however. Already, the trade war is squeezing private manufacturers in the global supply chain, forcing many of them to move production outside China.
The central government is encouraging state funds to bail out businesses with the most exposed stock, which local governments in Shenzhen and elsewhere have begun to do. Limits on equity investments by insurers have been removed, and 11 government-owned brokerages are creating a 100 billion-yuan asset-management plan to buy some of the stock sitting as collateral.
But private enterprises still lack a permanent source of funding in a country where government companies enjoy generous subsidies and always get first dibs on credit. Citigroup Inc. analysts in China released a report on Oct. 31 finding the government's measures far from adequate to fully restore the private sector. And that stock bailout? Done by state bodies, it amounts to partial nationalization.
China's central government is itself strapped for cash because of the slowdown, but it has a big incentive to come up with more funds: Privately owned businesses are responsible for 31 percent of urban employment, 50 percent of tax revenue, and 44 percent of exports, according to Citigroup. They provide more than 80 percent of jobs nationwide, says Xinhua, China's official news agency. Without access to credit, the average private Chinese business won't survive. —Gopalan is a finance columnist for Bloomberg Opinion.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jillian Goodman at jgoodman74@bloomberg.net, Howard Chua-Eoan
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.