Japan’s Top Diplomat Defends Firms in WWII Dispute With South Korea
(Bloomberg) -- Japan's top diplomat says it's up to South Korea to resolve forced labor claims looming over dozens of Japanese companies that are threatening to upend ties between the two neighbors.
Foreign Minister Taro Kono said in an interview Sunday that the South Korean Supreme Court's decision last week ordering a Japanese company to pay compensation to people forced into its service during Japan's 1910-45 occupation of the country posed a “serious challenge” to relations. Japan holds that such claims were settled under a 1965 treaty, which came with a $300 million payment.
“It's obvious: they are responsible for taking care of all the claims from the Korean people. So that's what they have to do,” Kono told Bloomberg News in Tokyo. “That's what's in the 1965 agreement.”
The court said Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corp. must pay 100 million won ($88,000) compensation to each of four plaintiffs who had sued over being forced to work for a forerunner of the company prior to 1945. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe told parliament last week that not all the Korean workers who came to Japan in the colonial era were conscripted, and that the four were brought over under a “recruitment” order.
The ruling is one of several disputes to emerge between the key U.S. allies since South Korea elected President Moon Jae-in last year. The two sides have also sparred over a pact to resolve disagreements over women trafficked to Japanese Imperial Army brothels before and during World War II and a spat over the “Rising Sun” flag that prompted Japan to withdraw from an international fleet review last month.
Kono described the labor case as a “totally different level of issue” from the others. There are 15 other cases pending in South Korea involving 69 companies, according to the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which refers to the claimants as “former civilian workers from the Korean Peninsula.”
“If any country gets into an agreement with the Korean government in international law and the the Korean Supreme Court could overturn the agreement any time they wish to, it would be difficult for any country to do anything with the South Korean government,” Kono said. “So they have to take care of this issue first,” or ties cannot move forward, he added.
| Other comments from Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Kono: |
|---|
|
Separately, Kono dismissed recent suggestions by U.S. officials that Japan could be forced to go beyond the limits it has laid down for bilateral trade talks expected to start in January. He said the U.S. must provide something in return for any Japanese concessions.
Japan relented after almost two years of stalling and agreed to trade talks with the U.S. following threats of tariffs on cars. In a bid to balance out its trade deficit, the U.S. is pushing for more access for its own cars as well as for farm products, after President Donald Trump pulled out of the regional Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Abe has said the negotiations will be narrower in scope than a free-trade agreement, and the two sides agreed Japan wouldn't be forced to offer more access to its sensitive agriculture market than it already provides under other trade agreements.
But Vice President Mike Pence said later that the U.S. would hold talks for a free-trade agreement with Japan, while Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue was reported as saying the U.S. should get at least as much access to Japanese markets as the EU, or members of the Trans-Pacific Partnership regional deal, which comes into force Dec. 30.
“The prime minister and the president create the framework and the negotiation will be within the framework,” Kono said. “Any trade negotiation must be mutually satisfactory, or there won't be any agreement. If we give something to the U.S., the U.S. will need to give something to us.‘'
--With assistance from Takashi Hirokawa.
To contact the reporter on this story: Isabel Reynolds in Tokyo at ireynolds1@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Brendan Scott at bscott66@bloomberg.net, John McCluskey
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.