Essar Steel Insolvency: NCLAT Upholds ArcelorMittal’s Bid But Says Creditors Can’t Decide Allocation
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal on Thursday upheld ArcelorMittal SA's resolution plan for Essar Steel Ltd. but has also stated that the committee of creditors has no role in distribution of the amount to lenders.
NCLAT had in May reserved its order over a batch of petitions against ArcelorMittal's Rs 42,000-crore bid for Essar Steel as well as the distribution of funds among the creditors of the debt-ridden company. Though the NCLAT had approved ArcelorMittal's resolution plan, it had kept open the issue of allocation between financial and operational creditors.
Delivering that order today, the NCLAT, in what will create a new precedent for insolvency cases, laid down what the Committee of Creditors can decide and what it cannot.
According to what the bench said in court, the resolution plan or bid amount will be distributed thus:
- Employees and those with claims of less than Rs 1 crore will get full repayment. This includes operational and financial creditors.
- Operational and financial creditors with claims of more than Rs 1 crore will get 60 percent repayment.
Essar Steel's Committee of Creditors sought a stay on the judgment, which the NCLAT denied. The CoC said it will challenge the judgment in accordance with the law.
Meanwhile, the Essar (Ruias) spokesperson said in an emailed statement that they are awaiting the detailed order to decide course of action.
It appears that new facts regarding ineligibility under Section 29A, which emerged only after the previous judgement of the Supreme Court, have not been given due consideration. We are awaiting the detailed order and will decide our course of action thereafter.Essar Spokesperson
The Squabble Over Allocation
The allocation issue arose after the Ahmedabad bench of the National Company Law Tribunal approved the ArcelorMittal resolution plan with a suggestion to the committee of creditors to reconsider the allocation to financial creditor Standard Chartered Bank Plc and 40 operational creditors of Essar Steel.
The NCLT had advised that the committee should allocate 85 percent of the total amount—Rs 42,000 crore—on a pro-rata basis to all financial creditors. The remaining 15 percent—Rs 6,300 crore—can be distributed among operational creditors, it had suggested.
This suggestion was given after Standard Chartered Bank had stated that against its admitted claim of Rs 3,487 crore, the resolution plan has allocated only Rs 60 crore to it—working out to 1.7 percent recovery. Compare this to other financial creditors whose recovery rate is as high as 92 percent, it had pointed out. And so, Standard Chartered Bank had argued that inspite of being a secured financial creditor, it's being discriminated against by the majority members on the committee of creditors.
The discrimination, it had argued, stemmed from the apportionment formula adopted by the committee of creditors—dues weren't being paid based on the proof of admitted claim on pro-rata basis but instead were being determined on the value of security possessed relative to the liquidation value of the company's assets. The bank had further stated that if a pro-rata method were to be adopted and each secured financial creditor given 85.6 percent of its claim, that would ensure a reasonable and fair apportionment of the amount.
In the same vein, some 40 operational creditors, too, had complained of inequitable treatment. The NCLT order had noted that a few operational creditors with outstanding amounts less than Rs 1 crore are being paid in full but others, whose outstandings totalled Rs 4,700 crore, will not be repaid at all.
These arguments by operational creditors had found some favour with the NCLAT, which observed during the hearings that there cannot be any discrimination between secured creditors. It had asked the committee of creditors to convene a meeting to reconsider distribution among financial creditors and consider allocating 10 percent of the amount for clearing the dues of operational creditors.
Even as the case was being heard, the suggestions of the NCLT and NCLAT on resolution plan distribution were appealed by the committee of creditors before the Supreme Court. In April, the apex court had ordered the various parties involved to maintain status quo on the sale of Essar Steel, halting ArcelorMittal from making a payment to purchase the insolvent company. It had directed the appellate tribunal to expeditiously decide on appeals. Now it's likely the CoC will revisit the Supreme Court for a final decision.
Essar Steel was one of the 12 large corporate accounts shortlisted for insolvency proceedings by the Reserve Bank of India in June 2017. State Bank of India and Standard Chartered Bank had filed insolvency proceedings against the company at the Ahmedabad bench of the NCLT.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.